New One Post!

Hi!


The "c" at the end of last post of Picture is a mistake, True, for the Emotion, but taking the chance for say that I can use it for Expressing, in Spanish "code", "c"... "sí", Yes!


I Love You, that's so True. My Heart's Yours.

Hi!


Came for completing, Trying, last text. I did add something to the before one, specially on Human Rights and specific references to personal freedom and to a complete and true education ones.
"23/09/2014

Sobre el último texto, quisiera formular algunas especificaciones al respecto. Concretamente, sobre los puntos 1) y 3b).
Respecto del segundo: esto que voy a apuntar es importante para comprender mis objetivos y mi método de pensamiento, puesto que de aquí se podrá deducir claramente cuáles son mis presupuestos teóricos y vitales. Cuando planteo los problemas reales que existen en nuestra razón para esclarecer la explicación vigente sobre "el origen del origen" del universo no estoy planteando una respuesta metafísica-científica (esto es lo único a que podemos acceder actualmente); sino que estoy tratando de mostrar (éste era el título del texto) los límites de la cognición humana. Si digo que el big-bang es el primer momento y que antes de él no tiene sentido preguntarse por nada más, no estoy expresando lo mismo que cualquier afirmación sobre el final de un espacio delimitado x -de conformidad con nuestros sentidos: ya planteé los problemas metafísicos de la discontinuidad de los cuerpos y del vacío-, puesto que en el segundo caso hay una clara comprensión de los límites percibidos por nuestros sentidos y por nuestra razón, mientras que en el primero no es así, en ningún caso. En este sentido, desde un punto de vista filosófico, esto es, de máxima abstracción de la comprensión, el problema metafísico de la eternidad vs la creación "datable" del universo no ha variado un ápice desde Platón y Aristóteles.
Con ello, no pretendo redirigir el pensamiento hacia una involución de los conceptos y problemas, sólo plantear la auténtica dimensión de los límites cognitivos del ser humano. Es más, y no lo hago inspirado por ninguna clase de prejuicio (no lo hice en el momento de llegar a estas conclusiones, mucho tiempo atrás, antes de dedicarme a fondo a la filosofía; si bien debo admitir, una vez situado en mi contexto evolucionario de pensamiento maduro, que los prejuicios tal vez sí existan ahora; ahora mismo explico el porqué), sino por la estricta pervivencia de la verdad.
Y por algo más, también. Por una razón de tipo social y moral. Creo que la fe ciega en la ciencia como fuente primera y única del conocimiento tiene efectos perniciosos para la sociedad, porque adentra al hombre, de primera mano, en la peligrosa senda del fisicalismo, más o menos conscientemente.
El fisicalismo es un peligro, porque es una rémora demasiado grande para el pleno desarrollo de las facultades, y necesidades, de la transcendentalidad humana, borrando de raíz su espiritualidad natural, y haciéndolo "naturalmente" infeliz.
Por otra parte, el positivismo acrítico que supone creer a ciegas únicamente en las verdades “materiales” o, mejor, materialistas, en su plena inserción social; de la ciencia (la ciencia es necesaria, pero también es necesario algo más) ha dado pábulo, en los últimos siglos e in crescendo, a la pasividad moral, a la inactividad de la solidaridad social y al aislamiento del egoísmo materialista posmoderno.
Con la explicación sobre los límites de la cognición no estoy haciendo apología de ninguna religión ni de ninguna escuela de esoterismo, aunque no intente tampoco discutir su legitimidad, siempre y cuando respeten plenamente todos los principios contenidos en la Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos, entre ellos, los derechos de libertad personal plena y a una buena y veraz educación.
Por otra parte, creo que la comprensión de la verdadera dimensión y naturaleza de los misterios insondables de la mente humana y del universo constituyen un elemento que nos iguala a todos los seres humanos y nos prepara, en una narración de sentido sobre la existencia, para la interaceptación mutua a escala global o universal. Realmente, la necesidad transcendente del sentido existencial es algo común a todos los seres humanos. Es importante reconocerlo y conocerse a uno mismo –y al fondo de su pensamiento y de sus emociones- y a los demás.

Sobre la noción de consciencia.
De acuerdo con el diccionario de la RAE, la primera acepción del término "concepto" es: "idea que concibe o forma el entendimiento". Por otra parte, en el mismo apartado, el diccionario define la paráfrasis "formar concepto" como: "determinar algo en la mente después de examinadas las circunstancias".
Más allá de lo evidente de estas líneas, parece en todo caso también claro que la acepción de lo que es posible especificar como "conceptualización" es muy amplio, en el texto referido, y que lo único realmente distintivo en la definición es el término "examinadas". Éste supone que la cumbre terminológica-semántica de la lengua castellana se está refiriendo al uso de las facultades superiores de la razón. Trasladando esta afirmación a mi propia teoría, esto supone referirse a la facultad humana de la abstracción conceptual.
El concepto o idea es la respuesta de la abstracción de nuestra mente, como facultad humana natural (ya expliqué, rudimentariamente aunque con un buen fundamento de principio, creo, los orígenes fundamentales de la adquisición bioevolutiva de esta facultad), a la pregunta humana por cualquier información sobre algo, cualquier cosa. Es decir, de cualquier pregunta, inquisición de la razón sobre la realidad percibible o imaginable (dicho esto sin concesiones de base estrictamente cartesiana), surgen uno o más conceptos.
La abstracción conceptualizadora se produce por medio de una dialéctica de percepciones múltiples y de razonamientos complejos en la mente, donde entran en juego las leyes de la lógica que rigen su parte cognitiva "pura" (fundamentalmente, el córtex prefrontal) y las leyes biológicas (aunque con ello no estoy afirmando que las anteriormente citadas no lo sean, antes al contrario) de los impulsos y condicionantes emotivos, nerviosos y hormonales de nuestra fisiología biológica, en general (hay que expresarlo así, dado que existen hormonas en el corazón y en los genitales, es decir, la red de la mente es mucho más compleja de lo que tradicionalmente se ns ha explicado, con una interacción plena de carácter de retroalimentación mutua constante con los sistemas nervioso y hormonal).
Es imposible establecer leges en forma de algoritmos matemáticos en términos precisos de todo ello, dado que para cada situación, incluso para un mismo concepto y persona, cada nuevo resultado es distinto del anterior y/o del siguiente.
Por lo que se refiere a la consciencia.
Me resulta igual o más interesante que en el caso anterior la vuelta al diccionario de la Real Academia, porque me ayuda a predefinir mi idea al respecto. En esta obra nos encontramos con dos definiciones. La primera: "Conocimiento inmediatio que tiene el sujeto de sí mismo, de sus actos y reflexiones". La segunda: "Capacidad de los seres humanos de verse y reconocerse a sí mismos, y de juzgar sobre esa visión y reconocimiento".
Esta doble acepción, con muchos espacios de significación comunes, trasladada al ámbito filosófico puede expresarse así: existen múltiples estados y niveles de consciencia, en función del estado mental del sujeto. La consciencia de uno mismo, en su sentido de abstracción máxima, consistiría en alguna clase de comprensión de lo que soy, o de quién soy. Existen múltiples niveles de complejidad consciente en la naturaleza, desde los animales más primitivos, pasados por los primeros mamíferos y los primates hasta llegar al ser humano. Y, para éste, también existen múltiples estados de consciencia.
Sobre este último caso, que es el que nos interesa directamente aquí (pero indirectamente, por su funcionalidad explicativa en el contexto teórico de mis opiniones), creo que tales estados han de depender de qué áreas del cerebro se hallen implicadas en cada momento. Ser consciente de sí no es igual en los siguientes casos: durante el sueño, mientras se realiza casi automáticamente una función física puramente mecánica simple, en la situación de un atleta de élite en plena competición o en una persona acostumbrada a la introspección, reflexión y meditación profundas.
Como en el caso de la formación de los conceptos, asistimos aquí también a la más absoluta complejidad de la mente humana, que se traduce en una irreductibilidad cuasiplena a generalizaciones empírico-teóricas de carácter matemático-formal.
Una vez sentado lo anterior, es necesario volver a hacer un esfuerzo para comparar ambas nociones, la de idea y la de consciencia, dado que en su momento afirmamos que ambas constituyen el espacio máximo de abstracción posible, incualificable en términos científicos tradicionales. Hay que explicarlo esto, al menos tratar de elaborar una introducción primera a esa explicación.
La consciencia es la idea de uno mismo. Algo hay en común, por tanto, ya de entrada, en términos muy simplistas. No obstante, las conexiones heterogéneas (lógica, emoción, sistemas nerviosos y hormonales; tipificación que guarda profundas contradicciones categoriales pero que por el momento debemos dejar así) del "sistema fisiológico del pensamiento" son miu distintas entre la consciencia y cualquier otra idea. La consciencia es una idea cualificada, y ello tiene una respuesta evolutiva. La aparición de los primeros rasgos biológicos que nos autorizarían a fijar la primera aparición de la consciencia, en términos antropomórficos o, mejor, "antroposemánticos", en este caso; son muy difíciles de determinar. Creo que, en un sentido primitivo, la consciencia "primera" podría calificarse como la aparición de la voluntad animal. Pero las fronteras biológicas de este concepto son mucho más complejas de lo que parece. ¿Nos referimos al primer sistema nervioso, formando muy progresivamente -entonces a qué momento de su formación- o nos referimos al primer cerebro primitivo -con las mismas objeciones en cuanto a la precisión de la determinación paleontológica?
No obstante todas las dificultades apreciadas, lo importante es comprender como la consciencia es un estado cualificado de la idea, precisamente por sus implicaciones biológicas, que se adentran en la más remota noche de los tiempos.
No obstante, la idea o el concepto también tienes sus implicaciones. Como ya dije en su momento, la capacidad conceptual aparece en pleno contexto biológico, de una manera específica (ejemplo metafórico de la ramita y las termitas, ya explicado); lo que sucede es que lo primitivo se halla presente de forma mucho más directa y presente en la idea de uno mismo, en la consciencia. Es imposible separar de ahí el instinto de supervivencia y de egocentrismo natural. El principio de la sabiduría popular "para amar a los demás, primero aprende a amarte a ti mismo" tiene todo el sentido que habitualmente le ha otorgado el sentido común (una conclusión "accesoria", sólo desde un punto de vista de la estructura argumental del texto, es que de alguna forma se justifica filosóficamente aquí la necesidad de la educación moral, desde la base de las propias herramientas biológicas de que disponemos; algo que ya expliqúe en su momento, más o menos, pero en lo que debo profundizar mucho más).
Pero, y volviendo ahora a la comparación filosófica-semántica "estricta" entre ambos términos. El problema filosófico de la consciencia es que no se puede ubicar en un espacio del cerebro, a diferencia de lo que puede hacerse, más o menos, con un tipo de pensamiento o emoción. Esto creo que se puede entender mejor, ahora que he explicado los fundamentos más básicos de la consciencia. Filosóficamente, la única respuesta posible es la estructuralización especular y triádica de mente-entorno-mente. No es posible decir, en terminología clásica, "aquí está la consciencia". Se la puede explicar, mediante narraciones como la expuesta aquí, pero no ubicarla en la mente, por la complejidad de evoluciones temporales-vitales, ontogenéticas y filogenéticas, conjuntamente.
Respecto de la idea, la conclusión ha de ser parecida. La capacidad conceptual, el concepto de "idea", no puede ser definida formalmente en términos filosóficos clásicos, tanto por su complejidad (grosso modo expuesta) cuanto por su propio carácter formal de fundamentación de la razón (ya visto en el apartado de la definición del concepto y en el texto anterior: motivos de índole lógica);y, fundamentalmente, por su carácter naturalmente transcendente respecto de su objeto (pulsión biológica e inmaterialidad a la vez; estamos en dos planos distintos, la realidad objetual y la realidad de la consciencia; si bien el concepto de nociones inmateriales es perfectamente posible -lo estamos haciendo ahora, su elaboración-, lo cual he tratado de expresar en la tríada anterior "mente-entorno-mente"). Sólo podemos definir la idea por su referencia a algo que la constituye, su objeto, por muy abstractos y generales que sean los términos usados, y prescindiendo del puro fisicalismo del mapa neuronal, el cual si bien constituye una ayuda fundamental para la investigación, no permite captar el aspecto inmaterial de la idea, consciencia de algo distinto o idéntico (expresión disyuntiva que trata de expresar en términos absolutos la especificidad de la consciencia de sí) a uno mismo.
Y aquí, en este último punto, creo que he apuntado el principio o nexo de equivalencia de planos cognitivos entre la idea y la consciencia. Es algo en lo que hay que profundizar mucho más allá, porque creo que en la comprensión de esta diferencia y de las similitudes fundamentales que contiene se halla gran parte de la comprensión del misterio del conocimiento humano."

Hi!


Coming for a little big Moment of the One Feeling for Goodness.
Today I'm not getting exhausted. I'm getting tired, only. Because I can send the text tomorrow with no problems. I do actually prefer to make it better though it has to be done a little slower.
Well, it's OK the Going

Hi!


Had to say more.
This evening I came because I did end badly the midnight. But from now on will only come in the morning, no evenings no nights Here. For Responsability and for Calm of All.
Even someday it's possible I am not coming, if much focused in working or writing thoughts.
But I'll Keep Coming for Sure. I Love You for Life. You're the Love of it, the Life
I will be sharing Ideas. If someday empty, because of much working or just because of much worked, maybe not coming.
But Always I may be coming, I'll do by the Loving.
Also, had to say something else. I Never Had any Idea about those years when you could listen to some post or phone conversation, directly or by references of others. I Did Know Nothing.
Well, that has not changed that Much!
Well, Be Quiet. Tomorrow it's almost sure I'll come in the morning, because Want to Share last Ideas. Real Achievement, Real New Level. Maybe now I'll feel satisfied enough for starting the academic task peacefully and totally focused in specific texts.
God Bless!

Hi!


I did not come very well, I did wake up too son in the morning today.
But those Pictures are so Really Lovely and Beautiful that anyone would change the mood for better. It's just my case.
I Did See more Nice around, Feels Good.
God Bless! Many Greetings and Best Wishes.
Yesterday I did finish the long Book! It's for Living a Celebration!
Really, it was so Good and I Did Learn so Much (I'd Need Much More!) on Philosophy of the Language.
It's going to be a Calm day today on Quietly Working, Modulation of Efforts and stress.
See in a while, Always Loving so Much!!


ps: Today it is the anniversary of Francisco Giner de los Ríos, Spanish Philosopher and Professor, so Bright. I Knew about him, but those bibliographic notes were so VERY GOOD TO READ.

Good morning!

I did not know if I had to come because my mood is so far from being good, for all around Here, because of neighbours. Yes, it's become a matter of principles. After going bed, I don't want they keep doing the same intentioned noises night after night.
A matter of Justice and Principles. Out of "buona fide", there can be only faked shadows of friendship. Nothing personal for anybody, just talking to the whole "virtual and secondary existence" created around Here.
Till this subject gets a solution the situation here will not be normal. Friendly terms, I mean.
I'm Very Focused in the Studying, taking Rorty Seriously as first One. Have to connect these 4 thinking streams (naturalismo interno from Putnam, razón comunicativa from Habermas, pragmatismo rortiano from Rorty and the realismo metafísico=cientifismo objetivista radical) and explain consequences of the monopoly of one of them, those I talked about.
Not so easy to find the bibliographic mechanisms for connecting this last path, but I think I'll do it well.
Probably in another post in the end of the morning, if I have time, I'll post some short summary on conscience. Explaining main characters that make impossible, in a narration of existential sense, the Complete and Absolute Objectivity on Everything. Something that has proved to be so easy for understanding a part -a part, not all: from the biocognitive limits that's not possible, absolute terms- of nature, but not for understanding the whole concept of Human Existence.


ps: Loving Brooke is not on business.
But actually can't go on handling the unfair and stupid things from others involved with the "3 plan". Respect, as Equal Ones, Respect Convivence and Respect Space of Each One.

Hi!!


Working so Much Well.
I'm quite about those things. To me, a public space is not the most propiated place for saying some kind of things to a Lady.
I'm saying because: feel some permission or at the very least some attitude for "do what you want now, we'll talk later" ; I do think I already express how childish, natural and, in fact, innocent, is everything; and, finally, because there're no other places for saying it.
I Do about things even when I


Seeing later, quite -only for Necessy Energetic lows - Peaceful!!

Hi!


How are things!
The mood's going on. Balancing the low levels well with the selflearnt pulsions for rising up.
This has to be something close to what's called maturity!
Tomorrow I Know Everything's Going Great, Truly Confindent, with True Fundament for that.
Thank You for Good Wishes.


For talking about other things (not obsessing; I was good at it, till I came and all; those were some crazy days; now they're over, pulsion should never dominate the hearted mind of any person), turning around with the doctorating. Now I Know I'll NEVER be very much read, any one of my texts (wait if I am going to be pulled to pay my own editions; at this moment I'm Already Sure), and by almost anyone; I am turning back to think about the need for doctorating.
I don't need it. Academic support, I mean, for doing my Thinking Tasks. And, at this moment of my life, the social prestige is something quite nonsense, actually.
This is not low energy. I AM SO BRUTALLY ( ) DECIDED to make my Task; just some reflection on time.
No hurries, I'll see. This public writing helps to think.
I Do Admit I'm Still Touched by those Your Words. I'll Need Some Time for Recovering the Normal Fun.
It's Normal. I Do Care. There's a Transcendent Bond between you and me. Not much wills for romanticism. I'm just being honest.
Many painful emotions, since I came.
Beauty's Now so Obvious and so Far, at the same time, in our Heart. It's like the Heart Beating Beautifully, You Can Already Feel it in your Chest, but You can not touch it with your hands.
It's All Provisional. I'll Be Feeling More Positive soon.
Forever away, in the distance.
Now I Admire You More.
But I'm still angry with you for taking me, by my blinded passion, to this open place. It's like the signing of a drunk non abilitated people. The law says the agreement is not going anywhere, if the deep lack of conscience and if the situation is intentionedly created are Proved.
I Wanted and I'll Always Want to Help, but I did not want to do this I've just talked about.
But not that much angry.
Though my Forever about You, don't You think I don't know we'll probably Never talk. It's All Right to me Now.
Less or more Frequently, even public terms, I'll Be Sending You some Loving Bits, Virtual Reality of years, losing, distance and Soul.
The Soul is Key. Gotta Be Strong. And The Soul Will Connect the Lifes.
I guess You've seen I've lately been lower posting words on the Love. I'll get deep into this ways. And the same about All. But I'll Keep Posting Ideas and, Always, some Caring Touch.
I am Going to Love You Forever.
How Very Beautiful and Extraordinary You Really Are. I'm More Blinded Now than before by Your Light.
I'm can almost feel the inner shaking, almost as strong as when I Did See You so close and Touch You, if I set my feelings free.
And to be True, about the social succes for my theories. The Fact is that They're so Beautiful to me, and that I Do Enjoy so Much the Making of them, that I think I'd write them the same even if I never nobody else was going to read them. I've Found a True Source of Joy There.
Well, and in some other places too.
Balancing. I am not scared from ending my days as Howard Hughes (sorry, I was not talking about social success or money) anymore. I've FOUND the Balance of the Living inside.
See in a while, Loving so Much and Forever!!
The notes of my heart beating say: Brooke, Brooke...
On sunday I spent more than an hour exercising in the water, and later exercising more.
Don't You worry about me. I Just Can See the Life Passing before my eyes in Much More Easy and Quiet ways than before.
Later coming for some
I Know I Can Help by the Coming. This Does Energize me too.

Hi!!


Tomorrow my uncle is leaving the Hospital. Everything did go so Well, for the difficulty, normal, it was so Well.
Have to say that I've added,as last point of scheme, 5.c), "the moral implications of the whole thing", well in some other idiome I am able to control a little better
Quite More Calm Here. The normal talking I am doing does Help too. I am not suggesting myself by my own words too much from now on , with some exceptions for Admiration of Love.


ps: that Song Makes me Dream of some Time when We are in a Real Movie, Living those Sung Experiences. Happiness. We are so Young.

Hi!!


Posting here because it's so Where's the sweet Jade!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCNHEcDr7nE
Her Voice, well, the giver of it, at the very least, is here!
I don't like very much this type of humor, but I do know this is very personal. The criticism can be brought on many ways. The acid is very obvious, as almost always -me not omniscent -, to me.
("omniscent"... "todo a cien" "voy a cien" it is better, or also maybe "todos cien= 3x100=300"
("todo a cien" was a type of shops where there was the promise each article did cost only 100 pesetas)
( ).
I am not putting this low, I'm following the joke.
I do repeat it again, I'm a little "petit cherie" for these things. The criticism is Obvious in this Well Made Adult Cartoons.

Hi!!


FOCUSED!
And the best of all, of everything, is that you all don't know what I'm doing now. You'll have to buy my book!


No, Very Seriously, I had to do this. I'm using the best literary style possible, and the most direct and clear possible too. Able for all. I can do it, actually. I see it, in my mind. Clear and explanatory index and less or more easy and fluid developing of subjects.
Please, don't think I'm going to ask for any financial help for editing my book to my rich Friends that come Here. I know I'm like the genius in the lamp here. And it's OK. Don't worry, I'll make my counting and will find out some easy solution.
I have to do it. In case it may results well sold, I'd pay or be payed (this second time would be easier I know and I've been told) for second edition. But first one will not go much further than 100 copies of the essay.
For what I've been starting to see, for index and some little initial developing of some points, it will not be so short one. More pages than Descartes "Discurso del método" or "Meditaciones metafísicas". It's not about the number of pages, but about Quality and Clearity.
WORKING!
I Have to Do, and I Know it Could Help right now, if Truly Listened. No matter if doctorate still not done (I'LL DO IT, TRUE!), I've got Knowledge Enough for this Writing. And, why not saying it, I'm a Natural for this.
Best philosophers in history, before modern academic plans for third stage as doctor, did never get a doctorate.
I Do Have Such a Big Amount of Faith on my Chances for Making a GREAT AND USEFUL Book. The commerical and practic results are out of my hands, and they're not worrying me too much.
See later on the Loving!!

Hi!!


My "pen win" has one question.
Because as long as the "desventrations" good regulation is a healthy issue, this is important; so, what do the penguins do, "marrón glasé" (as "castañas glaseadas")? And how they do use the palms ( on the remembrances )?
How bad, not the taste but the humor itself
Ah, those questions, inquietudes for a lifetime!
I've got Frege in mind Fine: global implications for and from his analitic philosophy, and connecting this to the undifferenced, by the systematic resituation of concepts as "inter-sense" -historical and conceptual meaning-, to the whole body of philosophy.
Making Easy but Clear. I can not find myself
Loving and Loving!!


ps: I was talking about...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIVWSjgHUkQ
"I sí, Brooke, ho he Suat bé".

Hi!


Sharing a little part of the texts I'm writing, the last one I did.  It's not for selling my book , but for sharing it.  Because it's Important (for different arguments there're), though obviously not enough for capturing the whole meaning.  Well, or maybe yes, from all I've been sharing for last couple of years here.
I can understand some philosophers or thinkers or scientistis may disbelieve or not trust very much a guy who's been studying philosophy, almost totally on his own for just 3 years, but I know that when they read all, I'm already sure, many of them who still don't trust will change their opinion.  Always Legitim, of course.
"La pérdida de la inocencia semántica a que se refieren John Perry y John Barwise, al tratar las cuestiones de la opacidad del lenguaje –para los supuestos de inserciones de segundo y tercer orden en las oraciones de relativo, por ejemplo- y de su ambigüedad, no admite teorizaciones meramente formales.   No existe un método lógico para demostrar que no existe un método lógico en sentido estricto, porque en tal caso debería existir un carácter de transmisibilidad entre categorías epistémicas que hacen lógicamente imposible dicha misión (esto es muy importante, y hasta dirimente); pero la tesis davidsoniana no admite dudas (AÑADIDO PARA EL FORO, POR NECESIDAD DE LA NARRACIÓN SECCIONADA: "tesis consistente en que toda teoría semántica requiere de los contextos del mundo de la vida, yendo más allá del uso o significado meramente denotativo del lenguaje").  Al hilo de esta afirmación puede resultar esclarecedor el recordatorio de un gran matemático como Gódel (de los más influyentes de la Modernidad), en el sentido de que no le parecía posible reconducir todo conocimiento a la lógica pura, porque debía existir una parte intuitiva en el mismo, de carácter inabordable para la consistente solidez del armazón  matemático perfectamente consistente (sólo aparentemente, en algún caso, al menos, como él mismo demostró) y cerrado sobre sí mismo.  En un momento posterior de esta exposición, de aportación original, tal vez se logre obtener alguna luz adicional al respecto".

Hi!!


Came in a fast, and really tired but happy, moment for Easy Expressing.
Brooke!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm in page 17 of my texts, also.
And You're so Beautiful. So Much that You Look like a Dream to me.

Hi!


How are things.  I had some mental Rest today.  Mechanical tasks did feel very good.  I used the brain for making them faster and easier, but the doing itself felt so good (and the use of the brain for the easier making was not exactly a big deal either)
Feeling Good!
But I have to be sincere about one thing.  True that it's in my head, since I read it, but now it came explicit terms to my mind: TRUE, before it was just a contradiction that I had no named by specific words but something existing as lack of sense in my mind.
The question, Honestly made, True: how is it possible to conscientiously keep a dark inner side, as a Person, and not being desingenuous at the same time?  From my Heart, I'm being Sincere, I can not understand.
HONESTLY, I think it's much logic, healthy and Good, to go away from the dark side, at the very least for what's related to conscientious behaviours.
I mean, Please, not getting obsessed about it, but being conscience of the Fact We can Cultivate ourselves the way We Want.  We're free for this doing.  We're Moral Beings.
It is not for discussion, it is just because I Care.  I do it for the same reason yesterday I was talking about "the world"
God Bless, Wishing so Much Well!
I'm taking easy for a couple of days the conceptual thinking.  I guess that when I start to "wildy" develope my personal thoughts I'll recover all of my energy
Well, I have to Educate myself on this too.  It's Very Important, I Have to Admit, and Do Coherently to this, that the History of Philosophy is going to be so Useful for Expressing and Proving the Reasons that took me to my investigations.
Yes, I Do Agree.  Life's Process.  We're Making it Healthy, I guess.
Big Hug for the Weekend, Have Great Time!
Loving Brooke Always, as Natural thing to do!!
Dedicating the Beauty of this Music to You, Focused in the Pure True Loving.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YzATenpPLc


ps: To Love is almost as Serious as to Laugh!!  For this, now there're no jokes involved with the Dedicatory, from my Heart, to the Universe.   Now I'm Feeling this One is You in the right center upon my visible sky.

Heidegger,


As opened letter.
I am working a lot on the text critizising your doing, in the past. I am going to destroy all of your confussion and seeds for the weakness and egotic development, something that did always have to end in evilness and suffering and lose for the People.
But it's nothing personal. I don't see any kind of intention for causing that pain and that psycologic horror. Our ignorance ("bobos"- You did it again, and the falling was exactly the same), as limited human beings, has no limits. But our courage for the fight and turning things around into the Goodness either, as the Human We Really Are.
I don't want to eat anybody, but I Have to Be Honest to My Conscience and my Heart.


I know History will situate Everybody on its Place. I have no problems with that. Maybe the money is a different thing. When one day in NY one credit card did fail me, I did really Fortunetely, I could defeat the problem.
It's such an event to me, the fact of being ignored and rejected like I was never before; used to be Wanted by the girls.
The fame I've been put as a hat on me, UNFAIR AND EVIL AND FAKE AS JUDE, as I am a stalker will close me all the ways up there. But, in fact, I Did Never Want to Come Up There for Living. No problems about it.
I would not change my Land for any other one.
But, Please, if You Want me to Go, don't spend the time in Evil games, just say it up. It's pure psycologic ILLNESS, this Doing for last 8 years. The Intentioned Contradiction and Confusing of One Person...
I'm Meditating about it again, but I'll probably post the Heidegger's "killing" text later, and will not come ever more again.
I Do Feel So Fullfilled, on my Sense of Responsability.
I'm not angry or deceived.
I'll have sex today, if I can, not alone, of course.

Hi!


"The romanticism of violence...".  That's a Real Subject.  It's something to Study Deep on, specially in actual movies from Hollywood, and many TV series too.
The problem is that the collective imaginary gets involved with published symbols, and they always get, one way or another, the psycosociologic sphere of people, specially the young ones, so influential.  The power of symbols, in this mass media culture is much focused in the visual images rather than the concepts themselves, argumented ones.  The matter is to think about what we want our societies to may become, in case we are not producers and people from movies exclusively worried about money.  To Educate kids in schoold for appreciating texts from Shakespeare (not so difficult at all, AND FUNNY FOR ALL AT ALL AGES), Mark Twain, Cervantes, Julius Verne...
They're All a Different Style to the orgastic explossion of special effects and of violence, progressively more and more (a call now; results of my uncle's operation has been revised today, and everything great) exaggerated and explicit, as a competition of all against against all for seeing who does make it more cruel and more agressive, sadic, dark or wild; and the same about the effects, about who can make them more realistic, more beautiful, expensive...
But the importance of Good Stories...
Educated People (that's a Right and a Debt for All, that All be able to Get a Bright and Complete -not only scientistic- Education) Will Always Like Well Written Stories, the Classics and those new ones to come.
It could all be made Much Better Made, in terms of this.

From now on I am not making any personal reference here.  Even not Brooke Shields.  I Know and Feel that's the Good way (though those monsters -they really are to my subjectivity, behind the wall of the ignorance and the brutal insensitivity from others- tonight get ).
But the Try for Bringing Sense is Sense to me.
I've started Reading "Juan de Mairena", by Antonio Machado.  There's a Mix of qualities: Literary, Wise and Funny; sometimes by moments, sometimes all together in a couple of lines.
I'll have to share some sentences.  Now I'm sharing some I've found in the internet, making sense as correlativity to messages of the day too, but this last one is not the main reason for posting them.  It's just that all does fit.

"Lo apócrifo, como principio político, literario y pedagógico, actúa contra el determinismo del pasado sobre el presente".
This means to be always critic before the official/canonic/orthodox version of everything, for very important reason of the truth, and the improving of the same history on the practise of this principle.

"Nada os importe ser inactuales..., huid de los novedosos..., de cada diez novedades que pretenden descubrirnos, nueve son tonterías. La décima y última, que no es una necedad, resulta a última hora que tampoco es nueva".
This is reflecting, on some acid ways, the importance of classics before the streams of the inertial actuality.  I don't know what he would have said, on these days, when things from yesterday are totally obsolet comparedly to the big amoung of them happened in the last microsecond.
This is Something IMPORTANT.  
Something very related (but far from catching the whole Meaning of Machado Sentences) is this: What about Andy Warhol and those 15 minutes?  Well, there's something called Equality and Democracy.  But, also, There's Also Called Reason, Fair and Truth.
It's difficult question, the consequences of Warhol sentence, but I think I've given, by this comparisson of values, some fundamental (any theory can be completely done for being directly taken and applied to real and factic contexts; thinkers can only bring principles, to be balanced and adequated to singularities) principle for it.
The acid is because of the fact he was a Very Good Knower of Philosophy (his grandfather did even write Good Essays), and was conscient about the inner contradictions from authors along history and, also, did know how the deep questions have not changed for the whole history of human.  I'll post some of his thoughts, that he takes to the mouth of the figure professor who is Juan de Mairena, like an alter ego (and he had a pupil called Rodríguez!!! Oh my! )

"Todo amor es fantasía:
él inventa el año, el día,
la hora y su melodía,
inventa el amante y, más,
la amada. No prueba nada
contra el amor que la amada
no haya existido jamás"
This is Good, and quite related to some Videos from the day on mistaken believes.
And well, this is "all" my folks (folks, but I don't believe in the incommesurability of cultural contextualism; this is not a natural thing but an artifficial thing, made from the ego of people and of nations and them together; I mean, Differences are obviously there, but it's just a matter of working for making them bigger than they are or working for making Human bigger than the accidental fact of the territories or cultures or social, economic and cultural status), by now.

Hi!!


Came for a moment for saying that yesterday's night, while reading, I had to remember that Great Antonio Machado was a True Graduate in Philosophy, not only Reader.
Oops!
Well, I know it's not so usual doing all this stuff I'm doing without the degree, as I'm doing, but for projecting from myself...
Well, You know, the advantage is that I'm not a graduate, I'm a True Love Believer.
That was a Try for a cuttie upon titles of Movies, and specially, their ends. For this context, not critizising them now. I did also Wanted to Take the Chance for a Tribute to Mike Nichols, Amazing Director. Rest in Peace. God Bless.


Brooke Loving's so Good!!

Hi on Goodness!


Came for a moment as easy moment of expressing the one Soul.
It's a Potency, but it's an Immanent Transcendence There to Be Found.


I did think a little more about title. Trying to not getting too much worried about copyrights or copylefts , this, I guess: "Crítica Integrada de la Razón Occidental".
Sounds even more grandiloquent than the first one, but it's much more modest, in fact.
Though, the Goal is to end the book as a Real Critic of the Reason, Integrated, itself for its same Fundaments.


Brooke Loving is Love Good, True!!

Hi!


Came for a moment for the One. Though I know there's not an only hand directing all stuff around me, and though there're so many things done towards me that I think are totally out of sense (the neighbours, Mr. Mateas...; Just Give me a True Chance of HONESTY, if You Want to See Normality!, but those psycologic strategies, enduring for years, are a waste of time, and cruel towards a being like me -sorry but it's True) and heavy till G, in the manipulated isolation (there're other things Good, at Work I'm Treated More than Good, and I am so Thankful, excepting for this gentleman I talked about, which therapy made through him is quite uneful and disgusting to me); Came for the One.
One Planet, One Being, the Human. The Sense is Served, We just Have to Play it.
Modestly, my role model Here, handling and handling and handling more, I Do Honestly Think is Inspirational. As Many Other More, many Better, All around the World.
God Bless, the Loving!

Hi,

only for a One's Moment Good.
I'm quite happy for the results I am starting to see on my investigations, these last ones I've been talking about. It's going to be clearer and easier than I thought. That's Important.
I have to control myself for each step, because the intelectual horse is so anxious for starting to run his wild course, my own concepts, but I have to keep it on the control road.
It's true that I am so sure I could convince Einstein about the Importance of the Transcendence Concepts. Departuring from the good enough fixing of the cognitive limits, and by all and through all, explain this narration I've been giving Here (like, p.e., the Need of the Transcendent as Values Morals, those so Important to him, so frustrated for some results from the bases of his theories; he just gave the fundament, as many times Painter Rafael used to to, but that was so Much!). To my "modest" opinion, anybody listening by opened ears should get convinced about it. But, well, that's "just" (these "" are specially as the integrated, in the text, symbology of my modesty ) my opinion.
I've Got such a Big Amount of Work.
God Bless, on the Loving Good!

I've made sense upon and from the last offending, connecting to all ones before.
Focused and Energized for the Important!
Going Upon, Up and On for Life, and Work!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

you have three choices: you shup them up, you make them leave away or you ... them off. But a simple Inmoral, Ilegal, Inconstitutional attack against Human Rights will be the starting of the nothing never more Here.
I'm so Seriously talking. So Very Seriuosly. Your manipulation circus is over Here.

ps: to All other People, those not involved with this stullf, I'm Taking Care, but this I'm Doing I Have to Do, because if not All I've been and will be Working for Dignity of Human will get devastated from its root, for my own uncoherency. As I said, I'll Keep Working STronger than ever, and I'll Share my Thoughts by my books.
I'll also Visit whosayBrooke. But nowhere else from the internet world I've been visiting till today (I now there're many places involved with the making in the shadows).

Hi!!


I'm not writing Here my improving thoughts because it all does need putting together, as I said when my thesis Director asked me to do it, remember?
This does need a real work, now it's walking the way up, for after making up and paint the map of the road. Both Things Already the same Difficult to me, but the first it is more, but Much More Funny. Anyway, the second one, the map, is a Duty and a Need for the Progress, Shared.
I'll write All in my book. And essence Here too.
I am also in the way of Progress for the Beauty and Sintatic Coherence and Order of my Exposing of Ideas by Words and Sentences. It's All for the Complexity of the Meaning to Transmit to Readers: beautiful, clear, coherent and profound (and original for Helping More, I Hope).
See later and for All of the Time!!