Very Big Tight Hug!

Hi!!


Yesterday night it's True, mind awaken and excited , did read nice number of pages, on Spinoza. I think today finishing this little Good Book.
This hot summer has made me so lazy, so very lazy at night. I touch the bed and just want to rest. So differently to this last winter or even spring too. I think these couple of days raining will have truly helped to much more normal temperatures, because even for this time, it was too much hot (yes, I'm worried for the global warming too, well, we'll see).
I am not introducing myself, in this field of the Philosophy, as a "fot qui fot" author dynamics, I'm just trying to find out the best from others and learn from it for my own sense, to be shared, obviously.
And have to say that though Spinoza is so Brilliant, a True Genius (even the same Damasio has Dedicated a Book to him), I see so many contradictions in his thinking. But I'm not describing them. First, because what I just said about the permanent dinamics of Peace and Mutual Help, and second for a simple reason of economy of efforts, because it's so obvious from the texts I'm writing. Though, there's something Tremendous in him, as it is his First Serious Try in History for the Union of Mind and Body. That's such an Enormeous thing.
Your Video Making did Wake Up some renowed Energy in my mind, and I actually feel it's able to bring me more intellectual rendiment than ever, though in a more paused way, not so... "thundering", and, thanks to this, much better and much less exhausting too.
Loving Hug Tremendous!!

Hi!!


No, Baby, it's You, "tutú" ( )
How Nice Picture!
And many more All around I could See.
God Bless!


Have You seen how the passing time does change so much to us All?


This Loveliness is "Made for Hugs"!!
I am actually a True obsessed one for Hugging Babies
Big Hug, This Beautiful Transition!!
On the Loving Good!!
Today starting the very Tasky mood. Yesterday's night I did finish the classic philosophy Book, and you can Always Learn good things there, and find one or another way that inspire your creativity, from the agreement or not with those brights and wide opinions you see in those Books.
And Telling Beside This, it's True I'm actually, in my mind, feeling like making moves with armies for bringing Babies to my chest. It's not exactly the king of cool feeling , but it does feel so Good, till already beating my tongue.
Big Hug!

Hi only a momeny for sharing normal last reflection related to last one.
Foucault sayd against Sartre and Hegel reason is not dialectic but analitic.
Coherent to dominance of linguistics methode from Saussare that inspires his theory.
Short terms, this means meaning of sense to him is almost only related to concept of meaning.
Though he is on task for global theory he does not change that.
My concep of sense is different and more largely including of element (explained: cognition as it is: symbol) and let us to go further than position on "non human" sources and at once to a more complete and true vision.
Explaining integration of metsphysics as normal natural functional essential part of human (sense, symbol, transcendence) reason you make transcendent sense (all global metanarratives are believes=non logic lineal causal nor positivistic; Lyotard well on understanding this specific part) and its all remaining human.
And big Love hug!! Good night, sleepy me now but as focused as always. This is Love.

Hi!
Beneath the sea. Probably last swim of the year. Good weather. Peace.
Vacation time getting shorter. Taking the chances remaining.
Waiting hard work for me. Not much more read before write.
Good Love hug!!

Brooke, "perquè som més caperrut que n'Steve McQueen" ( ).
About my summary on Derrida.
I think it can be well understood as summary, but need some more specific talk on:
1) the critic on phonocentrism: he does not totally capture the problem of self-reference, for this goes around the "phono" as some kind of less or more uncosncious reference to the logos of the truth. though, the self.reference problem is the origen for what he only starts to perceive but not totally understand as global problem.
2) this "As long as the idiome is not able to get reduced to the logic-formalism from traditional vision (based on the outside reference, as something fixed, for the sense and the concept of truth, from the outside of the text), he explains the opened and unfixable spaces of all texts", I said.
Well , the written language is the translation and at once the discourse from the metadiscourse of the logos, to Derrida. As translation, it's logic-formal structured, as the logos nature is; as "second" discourse, it's used, he says I think, as an instrument: the instrumental reason is the logic-causalistic one.
These two things, though he not directly explains, do express how he's not getting the complete sense of the metaphysics.
3) this last thing it's because, among other things, the metaphysics of text is as reductionist from the "original" global one as it is the doble dimmesioned paint of a three dimmensions figure, like the phenomena of the interaction between body and mind, for saying one thing among many other realities.
And, also, for explaining well the metaphysics in texts, he should have explained previously the problems, ontoepistemic kind, of human reason, as something integrated with itself (solving the problem of self-reference by the metaphysical structure of reason) and with nature or reality.
Then, by explaining the symbolism and emotion in all concepts, he could explain more properly the problems for logic-formal understanding of texts (poetry, retoric figures and using, literary sources...).
For the same need for conceptuality of human, I don't agree so much with him about the meaning of turning upside down all the possible understandings of texts by the "différance" for erasing that importance.
Though, I do agree when he does it, the deconstruction, for finding out all the incoherences in all texts, that come from the metaphysics of conceptuality and the possible different construction of Sense by each one, always able to fail.
But, for instance, what he says about Nietzsche: this is just a possible understanding from Derrida on the concept of feminine, but never a lack of coherence in Nietzsche texts. This is expressing the problem of the too much opening of meaning, the mixing of different concepts as if they were the same thing.
AnywayI like the opened space he left behind for going on. As long as it's for progress of thinking on Truth, I agree with. I'm never pretending to find the last truth. I just hope to fix some origen for it, as neverending process, but at once, never totally "perspectivistic" (much less relativistic, and of course, never totally positivistic). I think there's no turning back from the integrated reason of the "feeling of knowing", this a such a solid base for going away from "perspectivistic" vision of the world (concept meaning it's all depending on the perspective); because different perspectives can be made one coherence by the Sense, holistic understanding of truth. It's a qualitative epistemologic question.
The Reason has had a very clear Evolution on history of philosophic thinking. All theories were coming from problems all philosophers were finding opened from previous theories.
Some time, you find out some no turning point. And this is never represented by the whole theory of anybody, but by some key point. Like space-time of Kant (the concept of core self from Damasio Explains very well Kant was not wrong on it), or importance of cultural making of reason from Hegel...
This two last examples I've also used for explaining the fail I think Derrida takes when critizising Nietzsche. He's doing with best intention, something visible in the projection he's making from the problem of the self to the problem of "other" for ethics, for some kind of metaphysic tolerance against the antagonic terms; but you can not make confusions between, p.e., the biologic and structural and what's coming from culture. It's true both are mixed, and the line between, as (oh my I don't remember the name..., ah, now) Chomsky Knows, it's very difficult to get fixed, but there're some limits to the limits of certainty. There're things that can be fixed beyond the logic-formalism and, at once, get maintained on time: by the kind of thinking I'm proposing.
Now already almost satisfied about my explanation and self.reflection.


ps: I've got to read more today, but I think easy, because now I'm already tired. It was worth the efforts making!

Just as Inspired task more thsn a fight. Connecting philosophic bring, metsphysics, logic, evolution, physics epistemological fundaments, Human...
Big Good Lovely Eternal hug!!
When see next time be prepared because Gently normal Friendly Natural and socialized I'll hug!!

Previous post was "philo. Being" (ser). I meant.
And Without You, i would not have done it. For sure!!
Good night Love, my Heart!!

Hi!!
In bed, willing for rest.
But first good night!!
I could not post while ago for not be registered, but this is unseen and i thought it was web or internet problem maybe.
Read some on Bergson. He Focused, Systematic, on Zenon paradoxes for explaining fundament problem of metaphysics: think and explain the movement. For this, all knowing ot less or more, from Plato and Parmenid, fixed in fixing the fixed and constant. But it is not solving bottom problem.
Great!
But though Bergson was an evolutionist convinced, he did not go deeper into biology constituting structural cognitive functionality of our mind.
For this i guess happens what Great Book says: he somehow fundamenting on Zenon and uncoherently for many times discussing him at once.
Me "xulet" now but good LOL
Just trying for sense and truth. Because as Bergson says, the true entity of theories can only get visible by experiencing results of it before problems that may be related to its context of regulation.
Big Loving huh, Heaven!!
Now sounding Great Michael, wow these mental feet of mine.
See You in Dreams and for Life!

Hi!
Truly Nice around! God Bless!
Big Loving hug!!
Touched Beautiful night, unexplainable by ordinary words, at this transcending stadium of consciousness; it is Magic!

Hi!


Working focused. Good.
Some more easy talky for help (me too) and share.
We All need a sense of freedom. Our transcendent selfconscience does need it.
Practic terms and Spiritual terms.
Practic terms, nobody's totally Free.
Spiritual terms, some inner routes to wisdom, is Fundamental for the Perspective, as Healthy one, towards practic one.
I Admit I have worked, and still working, very much on both ones (talking now on Normal things of daily living).
Freedom and Respect are Two Fundamental non material Needs!
It's Possible.


I have asked for free day on friday. There's the reading of a doctorating thesis, by Raul. On comparisson between "Heráclito" and Nietzsche. Wow!
Me Interested for the subject and also for the practic model to see as facing the moment (and also for deducing the practic structure not only of the exposition but also of the making itself, of the thesis).
This way I'll not have consciensce problems of time.
ah, and I think I did also find (sorry me, modestly, I am on the most inspired time of my life for the Thinking-Creating "tasks") good thing when shared all those 3 concepts on time: Kant (perception to reflection and knowing), Einstein (physician-mathematician) and Bergson (existentialist one). I will be thinking on it too, but today, mainly, the structure of essay. it will take me a good couple of days, this, but I will combine this with other tasks of thinking (different but related subjects all). Anyway, it is as dynamic as much the time is longing the task of the writing.
I Admit I am for the proximity I Feel to the final global idea, point by point (maybe not 12, probably less; 10 is good too ).
Your virtual proximity is Tremendous too. I can not talk about the physical one. It's melting aluminium, at the very least
Big Good Loving hug, Beautiful; and Bright (I'm not focused specially in only one of these two traditional sides, and I'm not interest at all at making special emphatic references to one or another; Both are Tremendous!!).


ps: Going easy, going Well.

Hi! Only a while: how many Nice posts around!
Ah, and Tom Hanks is Tremendous.
Oh my. Very Good Feelings in virtual Kindness today All around.
Very Motivating.
And very Good Tight Kind hug!!

Hi!!
Came for sharing I've been writing in couple of minutes the main key parts of concepts of "logic digression" and "comprensión de la experiencia intuitiva-vital".
I will write as much as necessary, but after this last qualitative jump, on vacation time, I will not need as much space as before for explanations. I can make them much more directly.
Well, this is the latin style, copyied by modern science: directly: this is it, because this and this...
The greek style is Plato. You start by, like a good restaurant, by easy things, talking about things that for sure have touched anybody as problems to reflect on, and progressively taking the reader to the core of the argument, like some wizard.
I'll take both, I guess, as a try.
Today mind operating high rendiment for Creativity.
Though I Admit this is complemented by the automatically coming back and forth -between consciencious state/subconscious one- Feeling of Touch You. To Experiment this has to Be... oh my.
Now, So Very Inspirational for Working!!
And Speechless with Wills for Talking (and More) More!!

And I think the love for her was only a fantasy. I wanted to bring back to life that Person I was when 17 and so.
But, whatever happens, I am not going to be that Person anymore.
All my projections on her, on my own , were motivated for this: Find that Innocence and Magic I used to feel when I thought about her when young.
It was a key age.
Yesterday I was walking along for places I used to see and sometime stay with Carol (one moment, Marc Work has come for Work).
She was too liked, and I was too poor. Though what it may seem, the social consciencousness is there also in 12 years old kids, and even younger.
She was I think attracted by boys with moto, from 14 years and on.
Two things happened (she was there in the karate humiliation; and one happend to my father by himself, and by this, to me) after years were a surprise. She with modest normal boy, and she remembering eyes and so...
When older, 14-15, I admit she with a girlfriend and I with a friend did meet again and they looked like interested. But it was both of them, not much romantic... Normal to me beautiful boy ( ).
Probably, many things are not what they seem to be. or maybe yes, I don't know.
All I know is that I was Wishing so much to Feel like when I was 12, yesterday when I walked around those places.
but I am not going to be there anymore.
I Admit the couple I have, though All my INSENSITIVE behaviour here related to her (though she knows, probably this is making things harder to me), and this is How I've Always Felt (but I was too blind and selfish); and though those travels to the USA for nothing; I think Loves me.
It's not Romeo and Juliet, but who is on these days!
We'll stay together as long as we can, for the age difference. I debt so much to her. She pulled me out from the stream of True Existential Decadence I had falled on.
And now I have to Lovely kids, They're like my Babies, somehow. It was not intentionally made, I Swear. But there is, and it's Beautiful. I'm Enjoying the little time I'm going to have with them.
I Know I'm too much inertial guy on the focusing for being a good parent; so, this could not have been better to me.
This Love from the Kids Have Been Blessing, Inspiration, like some Definitive Salvation for Life, Experiencing those times with them.
And this is all.
Bye

Hi!


I thought a good and big morning Hug could not be that problematic to my health ( ; I keep going by good resting at night, this is key for these efforts), and just came for this.
Fixing essay terms very much, almost all organized for developing well. Structure of index almost Perfect to me. In fact, the doing of it, did already make all much easier to be seen as future development. Sense of All my Explanation is getting more and more visible to my mind. It's Good.
Many Greetings, Big Loving hug, Have Beautiful Day!


ps: the Reading of "The ugly duckling" was very Good. All it's very "pulling into the story": music, sound effects, Voice... Touching.
Coming this way, once a day with the only intention of Big virtual Hug is not much exhausting, and I think it's Very Good.
Again, Big Hug!!


psII: that today Video on Art on Women was very Nice to See!

Universal, symbolically.
How are things! Today resty mind.
Starting week hard and focusedly on working.
Good ideas on weekend. Bergson Genius helping. We have same fundament for defense of existential freedom , though, as it could not be differently RELOL, i think my perspective is more inclusive, total. Cant wait for Sartre on it.
Ah, and my extreme beauty (just in case some couldnt notice, its a joke) sonetimes dont let me focuse intense enough on the agenda.
I can use almost all of the april of next year for finish essay. One left for thesis. And this can never be as conceptually as difficult.
Good night, a Loving hug!

You too Much Beautiful and Adorable for Living away from Hugs!!

Hi Good and True Wishing Well,
No reading now because think of the concept of time.
Very important (no double meanings) to Bergson and Heidegger.
I turn around idea that intellectualizing is taking things to specific plane, metsphysic, of epistemic sense, and there its not time working but consequential implication.
Time comes along with the only sensitive experience.
Though this is always connected to epistemic sense.
And when Mindfulness for practic going?
And when fulfilled intellectual experience?
Is it possible inner counting of time does need some emptiness from those complete inner experiences?
I think the epistemic plane is out of inner time. And, also, thats very possible the plane of purely feeling, associated or not to sense, is timeless in the inside if theres fufillment.
"Problem" is fulfillment of mind is never taking too long, for natural mechanisms of survival, and for this always, at one or another moment appears the inner timing experience, on different scales depending on the person and the experience and consequent level of fulfillment.
Think out loud diffic. Stuff helps.
Hug Good night, Love!!

Hi!


While listening to The View (expensively, have to modestly - - add, because this counting of "megabites"... , I dont understand a thing on it ... this geniusity of me! ), think about transcendent logic relationships that help us to play the inferences and the implicative conclusions from deduction.
Have also to determine better the points between induction and deduction.
Yes, I Agree... I can not be a healthy mind person
And I came on easy moods, for the less or more tired from yesterday (have to write it again not only notes at hand on the paper).
It's true that I'm getting delayed start on the definitive writing, but the more fixed get all, the easier will get the writing, and the Much More Quality helping this will get.
And now a Hug Good, sensitive but very impulsively and naturally strong!!

Hi!
A moment for important.
By this proving of concepts me not into pure idealism. Important to understand.
Theres the emotions and the feeling as key elements of this
Sense, built up by essay and text i have to make up as concentrated using of logic for the bases.
No forgetting Human Touch. Its just about the Good perdpective for it: spirituality of the other with us as not in total relstionship of instrumentalization, where there has to be a fixed eternal core of True Empathy, built up and from mind and heart at once.
Ontoepistemic studies show this way as Real and Worth Enough Purpose.
And i had to use this way because
of my historic context of existence; where teoric problems very specidic had to be solved very specific ways.
Good Loving Hug!!
Goodness God Bless!
And oh my how soon im missing this resty days lol

Can anybody see, finally, why I also (like anyone of you ) detest myself?
The truth is that I'm actually "wild" developing of brain, in the sense of social shame for guilty feelings of supposed feelings of superiority from me.
I am as I am.
And sometimes, even not this!
Yes, I'm like the Nicest dracule from the Sesame Street. My uncle, when it's on good mood, now less usual for problems of life (health and so; though now less or more OK); does at these questions when he's the leading role.
Not pressumption, it's some metaphysic True INner Joy for the developing of these ideas. By this I do just express how I'm feeling inside to myself.
Well, a hug and now to meal.
Later Rapunzel.
Good Lovely Hugs!!

A comment to public and private forces who participate in what i said in last poem:
I know all my computers are taken, but im finding progressively easier to only share my thoughts with myself, as meaningful doing.
In times like this, when we need union and bright people making up the sense for it, what these forces
have been doing to me is not only Evil but also Highly Stupid. I was not waiting much from informal institutionality, but from -disguised- formal one... It puts my hope down for future cause i see the reality of those who supposedly have to guide this world to the light.
This not personal, though its problem in the sense thus means nobody doing anything cause no material rendiments involved.
Im making my work. Do yours and save this situation and save your legitimacy and/or your destiny.
God bless!

Human Love pulsions much more calmed, all of the time those eyes and all on mind at once, though eyes are the epitome of everything.
Now, i can public terms say -just cause its True- clear im on my
knees, Lady, Angel!

For what I see, my bosses, Francina Armengo, Iago Negueruela, Isabel Castro Pilar del Castillo, all excepting the last one from the PSOE are trying to intimidate me.
They're sending me to another office for 15 to 21 days.
I see there's a real interest for Dominating and for Proving who's Ordering here.
I'd send them all, with All of my Heart, to hell, and to All in the Conspiracy with them (probably high instances of the spanish state, I am sure).
But I'll obey (fucking up for sure my task for next weeks).
Though, I'm CHANGING my usual social politics of institutional loyalty in public contexts.
The choice of voting PSOE is failing for a real change in Spain.
PODEMOS, with Pablo Iglesias, Republican but Good, is my choice for Real and True left politics for Saving the Brutal Differences these last years have been producing in Spain.
I'll say more, it's very probable I'm getting afiliated to this Party. I've got a friend very connected, and I'll see.
PSOE is bad, is connivency with opressors under the faked skin of progressism; and a very big bagagge of crisis. The last goverment, directed by PP, had REal problems for paying the bills, because the previous one, directed by this party, had not distributed by the reason the money: it was coming the situation to a True Collapse, because nobody was going to get payed.
It's OK. Now you can send me definitive ways to another building, Democrats for Always

Hi!
Later telling surname. Want it well and True i dont remember.
Next weeek finishing "all" on Russell. Starring Wittgenstein before middle of it. That book.
Very Ready Supressing historic critic will help.
Big Good Loving Hug, from Heart!!

Hi!!
Big tight hug for Never freezing Heart, cause Beauty is Naturally Eternal!!
Adore those fixed eyes. I dont like very much too long fixing on me (as anybody i could say on fun for just saying obvious things); but those Eyes... For Eternity on me i want, i Dream of them, i Miss them since the thunder travelled along between glances.
I Love You, from those enlightening windows to All!!
Good night, Beautiful