Brooke Shields Fan Family

Forum for Brooke Shields Fans
 
HomeHome  PortalPortal  CalendarCalendar  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  

Share | 
 

 Philosophers

Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12
AuthorMessage
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13946
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: Philosophers   Tue Nov 20, 2018 1:17 pm

Hi Smile

just came for a Little while to Express I Like the Videos of the day, and also cause it's "El Día Internacional del Niño"...
Very Hearted.
I finished the 7.4 point, the last one before the eight "final reflections".  I think i'm finishing at the end of the week cheers wave Smile
At this specific moment, i'm almost on musical, emotional and may be even rational resonance with this Music (too many Memories too, Dealing Fine and Calm, Balanced Fixing Well)...

Goodness!
And a RESPECTFULLY KIND hug to Brooke and to her Family!  Merry Christmas!
flower  love smiley  flower

and i had not been thinking about it, but for the day it is, i'm sharing this point 7.4.  Little grains of sand + Little grains of appreciation = Little hope chances; and Today it's Enoughly Tremendous Smile
im sorry cause this time i could honestly not evítate to write a couple of notes, which are not appearing here  Rolling Eyes
it's not finished, finished; i have to edit, but i think it will not be requiring too many touches.  Humbly opinioning on self-critics.

"7.4.- La justicia y su imbricación con el derecho.  El derecho como garantía moral de primera magnitud.

La justicia tiene un carácter un poco específico con respecto a los demás elementos de la polisemia ética-moral integrada [metalógicamente: no hay ninguno de esos elementos que resulte igual a otro, pero todos tienen una imbricación consubstancial entre sí]: su reciprocidad y su “relatividad” intrínsecas.  Podría decirse, como comprende John Rawls, que la noción de justicia representa la dimensión social por excelencia del bien moral.  
Ciertamente, y como ejemplo, la virtud moral es un bien que se proyecta en uno mismo y en lo social (la conexión entre ambos aspectos es recíprocamente constitutiva); pero es un bien que, en un sentido genérico, no necesita inevitablemente de la “balanza de pesos” socializada, para mantener una entidad significativa y una vigencia práctica por sí mismo.  Rresumidamente: tiene sentido hablar de la virtud de un sujeto que vive en soledad; pese a que esto se valore en función de unos criterios socializados.  
La justicia, en cambio, nace y se desarrolla de forma esencial en lo social, sobre los criterios básicos de la imparcialidad y de la equidad.  Un sujeto que vive aislado podrá definirse como virtuoso o, incluso, como cumplidor de un deber hacia sus propias creencias, o hacia Dios; pero no parece que una de las formas principales de valorar su conducta pueda ser por su mérito de ser justo.
Por otra parte, en los procesos por los que se desarrolla la noción de justicia [en ella, otro rasgo característico es la distribución efectiva de los bienes y de las cargas; una distribución que no tiene por qué decidirse ante un tribunal institucionalizado; por ejemplo: el padre que reparte castigos o regalos entre sus hijos; el cónyuge que decide trabajar más de lo inicialmente pactado en las tareas del hogar, por razón de una sobrecarga laboral, más o menos temporal, del otro; el niño que decide compartir su bocadillo con el compañero de clase que ese día no ha podido traer su comida de casa; etc.]; se dan, podríamos decir, tres niveles decisorios principales.
El primero se refiere al ámbito más primitivo del juicio, aquél ejercido desde el yo egoísta que busca primordialmene su supervivencia y su autosatisfacción, con la única referencia “moral” de  sí mismo.  Este nivel siempre forma parte del proceso, incluso en los jueces más probadamente imparciales (por razones de la acceptación de los criterios de la mayoría social, por posibles recompensas o evitación de castigos…); aunque en cada caso influirá de un modo muy variado y graduable.  En muchos supuestos es posible que exista, incluso, no tanto una elisión completa de esta dimensión, cuanto de sus motivaciones más egoístas; esto es: cuando la satisfacción del yo se centra casi exclusivamente en hallar la verdadera objetividad de lo que es justo (la imparcialidad de Smith, el deber kantiano...); aunque, como sabemos, esta objetividad no puede ser absoluta.  La vertiente de la subjetividad, en todas sus escalas, nunca es obviable.  Así, en el supuesto más justamente resuelto por un sujeto, siempre podremos decir que -al menos, en todo caso- se dará una satisfacción personal por la felicidad del deber cumplido...
En segundo lugar, y en directa relación con la última parte del párrafo anterior, se encuentra el nivel decisorio del “espectador imparcial”.  Como ya comentamos, esta teoría sigue adolenciendo de un serio defecto, cual es el de hallarse en conexión teórica directa -y mutuamente constitutiva- con una “simpatía” que no puede ser universal, por las razones referidas en su momento.  Aunque deseemos actuar de forma imparcial, por razón de nuestra finitud (en un sentido global), el factor de la simpatía sobre la cual decidir imparcialmente siempre variará en función de nuestra relación y/o afinidades  con los sujetos implicados en nuestra resolución moral (aquí tendría especial relevancia la teoría de Sartre sobre los grupos sociales, entre otras).
De igual modo que la búsqueda de la satisfacción personal (aun en la forma de la recompensa por el “deber cumplido”) no puede eliminarse de la ecuación (lo cual tiene casi todo que ver con la necesaria coformación de cada Sentido ético-cognitivo integrado), la falta de paridad en las filias y en las posibles fobias que sentimos hacia personas diferentes constituye una factor altamente influyente (aunque no en un grado definitivo o absoluto) en nuestra toma práctica de decisiones.  
Con todo esto, al igual que en la dimensión anterior, no quiero significar que no sea posible luchar contra el impulso más o menos inconsciente de favorecer a las personas que despiertan más simpatía en nosotros, en detrimento de los que despiertan un nivel menor o, incluso, directamente, sentimientos de desagrado, enfado o náusea (en una escala también muy variable y que puede llegar hasta extremos realmente graves: los procesos de la jurisdicción penal se encuentran repletos de estos ejemplos, afectando a jueces, fiscales y abogados).  Sin embargo, en la práctica humana, trascender esta segunda dimensión precisa de otro salto cualitativo hacia la tercera (no en términos absolutos, pues esto es imposible como sabemos).
La tercera y “última” dimensión es aquélla que parte de un código moral universalista [el derecho penal, por ejemplo, así como todo el derecho en general, parten de una objetividad incondicionada y de una igualdad radical entre todos los sujetos jurídicos sometidos a su específico ámbito de vigencia y de aplicación], susceptible de ser aplicado a “todos”, de un modo “absolutizado” ideal, a partir de las “reglas de oro” de “amar al prójimo como a uno mismo” y de “considerarle como un bien en sí mismo”.
Dada nuestra nuestra finitud ética-cognitiva, el proceso de acercanos a ese punto ideal sólo puede venir de la mano de la interiorización de un Sentido integrado de totalidad y de una afectividad bien justificada hacia un código ético-moral, consistente en sus principios fundamentales y dotado de todos los instrumentos teóricos y prácticos (sobre la reflexión y la educación, en el seno de la Razón integrada) necesarios para justificar su bondad, en la referida perspectiva existencial y global del Sentido.
De conformidad con los capítulos anteriores, este ideal sólo se corresponde con un Humanismo netamente universalista, compatible con nuestro paradigma raciomoral.  Desafortunadamente, y como es notorio, así como el derecho penal se acoge al límite territorial del estado, muchos códigos morales de amplia relevancia se quedan anclados en las dos dimensiones anteriores.
En esta triple caracterización de la justicia se percibe, cre que con bastante claridad, su importancia primordial como punto de referencia ética y moral, en todas las sociedades [Rawls tiene su buena parte de razón, al otorgarle prioridad específica a este bien; no obstante, si recordamos, este autor no diseña unas bases teórico-prácticas autoconsistentes para la formación de su modelo, y, asimismo, prescinde  de los aspectos fundamentales de la adhesión justificada, emocional y  trascendente-espiritual a un código moral univesalista abierto, en toda su asumible objetividad -simbolizada, educacional, progresiva y democráticamente]; pero, desde una perspectiva más práctica, también se observa su insuficiencia como criterio moral destinado a velar por sus propios fines (la casuística histórica de la Humanidad de fe de ello).
La finitud humana, para lo bueno y para lo malo, en todas sus dimensiones excepto la de su propia trascendencia metafísica (la cual, paradójicamente, deviene expresión de esa misma finitud); ha demostrado históricamente que no es posible, al menos por el momento, confiar sólo en la sabiduría y en la bondad humanas para la salvaguarda práctica de los valores humanistas, y más coancretamente, del bien primordial de la justicia (moral, social, económica, jurídica…; todas ellas son concreciones de una misma cosa).  
Y aquí es donde entra en escena, y por “derecho” propio (casi con sonido de fanfarrias, podríamos decir), el derecho.  Esta categoría específica y “autónoma” (enseguida veremos el porqué de estas comillas) que, a su vez, es subcategoría de lo moral; nace como instancia garantísta de los principios ético-morales más relevantes y necesitados de protección; lo cual llevaría a cabo por un principio jurídico y democráticamente aceptado de coerción potencial legítima  sobre el ciudadano y sobre sus posibles agrupaciones (siempre justificada jurídica y moralmente, en cada aplicación concreta).  Como se puede ver, en en dicho principo confluyen una naturaleza jurídica-ejecutiva y una naturaleza ética.
La creación del derecho y su aplicación acontecen como una continuidad ontológica, ética-jurídica y socio-política que no es posible obviar.  En contra del positivismo jurídico más radical, el derecho no sólo constituye un sistema público objetivado para la resolución de los conflictos positivizados entre los sujetos titulares de derechos [ante la instancia pública-social superior que es el estado, persona jurídica “superior” dotada con potestades decisorias y coercitivas, por razón del empoderamiento democrático que le ha sido otorgado por el pueblo soberano; en esta doble instancia se origina y se fundamenta la legitimidad y la aplicabilidad del Derecho vigente]; sino también una realidad que se vertebra sobre todo un conjunto de valores y de principios morales.
A los efectos de explicar esta naturaleza, nos puede resultar muy útil introducirnos por un momento en los criterios legitimatorios generales de la vigencia y de la eficacia del derecho.  Éste nace del estado, como antes lo hizo de la ciudad -o polis-, del imperio, del feudo, del reino, del burgo…; pero esta derivación constitutiva no tiene un carácter originario, sino secundario.  En las democracias modernas, el derecho emana de la soberanía popular.  Su aprobación democrática y la consiguiente promulgación de la norma jurídica suprema (en la apreciación y elucidación del papel jerárquico y fundamentador de la carta magna o constitución, la sagacidad de Hans Kelsen es proverbial)1 constituyen una verdadera instancia de legitimación ontológica, jurídica y ética-moral de todo el cuerpo del derecho vigente.
Es el carácter social y libremente pactado  de las normas jurídicas de la convivencia [al menos, en el sentido ideal de la representatividad política; quiero decir: el pueblo elige a los miembros del parlamento nacional, quien redacta la constitución que luego habrá de aprobar el pueblo que le eligió; “seguidamente”, en el sentido jerárquico y en el sentido temporal ideal -esto es, sin entrar ahora en los típicos problemas de la transitoriedad entre sistemas jurídicos-, el parlamento redactará y aprobará a lo largo del tiempo todas las normas jurídicas que habrán de regir en un estado], la base de la legitimación de todo el edificio jurídico y jurisdiccional de cada sociedad [el conjunto de ésta representa la fuente generadora del derecho, la cual a su vez se halla sometida al imperio de éste; ese conjunto de personas “reunidas” por el derecho vigente se halla constituido por la población que nace y vive en el territorio de cada estado; a esto cabe añadir que existen otras tipologías del derecho que se solapan con la definición anterior (no podemos entrar ahora en el estudio de esas relaciones): el Derecho internacional, el derecho supranacional -como el de la Unión Europea-, el derecho de otras entidades situadas dentro del territorio del estado, como las comunidades autónomas españolas, los estados de EEUU, etc.; asimismo, junto a esta clasificación existen otras, como la correspondiente a las diferentes ramas del derecho: Civil, Penal, Procesal, Laboral….].
En definitiva, la legimitidad del derecho no puede descansar exclusivamente en criterios formalistas y positivos autónomos.  El conjunto de las normas jurídicas (desde la norma suprema) parte de su plena inserción en el sistema social de los valores vigentes, a todos los efectos del consentimiento democrático para su creación y vigencia, y a todos los efectos de su aplicabilidad concreta -a través de los jueces.  Se trata de una conexión que ninguna teoría jurídica mínimamente completa puede olvidar, la que se da entre los conceptos de la legitimidad jurídica, del consentimiento libre y de los valores ético-morales de una sociedad.  Y esto engarza teóricamente, de un modo bien directo, con el eje propio de nuestro discurso.
La integración de esta suma de conceptos no ha sido para nada fácil, ni pacífica, en la historia de las democracias y de las diversas teorías jurídicas.  Frente al positivismo formalista de autores como H.L.A. Hart [y más allá del llamado “realismo jurídico”, que prescinde de la connotación legitimatoria y valorativa del derecho, para centrarse de un modo casi exclusiva en su vertiente sociológica; y, asimismo, más allá del iusnaturalismo de raigambre platónica], Ronald Dworkin elabora una teoría del derecho que parte del reconocimiento de la naturaleza ética-moral intrínseca de lo jurídico.  Merced a esta idea  y, más concretamente, mediante el reconocimiento de los principios generales del derecho como una naturaleza heterogénea capaz de transitar entre lo jurídico-formal y lo valorativo-materia; el autor puede trascender el problemático ámbito de la aplicación racional de las normas en la vertiente positivista.
Como bien comprende Dworkin, los criterios tradicionales de la separación estricta entre la objetividad jurídica y la esfera ética-moral se topan con un serio problema: la integración de los “casos difíciles” (aquéllos no claramente resueltos por las normas) no puede tener lugar conforme a principios estrictamente formales.  Por la aplicación de estos criterios, sólo cabe una aplicación “in toto” de las normas (esto es, conforme a criterios de totalidad, tanto en el sentido de su aplicación, cuanto en el de su no aplicación; para comprender esto debemos recordar todo lo explicado en torno a las diferencias entre la logicidad formal y la lógica transcendental del conocimiento humano); pero dichos “casos” requieren de una interpretación jurídica de las normas vigentes disponibles, y no una radicalización positiva-jurídica-formal por la cual aquéllas devienen totalmente disfuncionales en el caso.
La solución que trae consigo Dworkin es la de considerar el derecho como una estructura abierta y “heterogéna” de juridicidad y de moralidad, donde los principios generales del derecho desempeñan un papel fundamental en virtud de su aplicabilidad conforme a criterios “de peso”; esto es, conforme a una escala graduable y no formal hermética de los significados jurídicos (y esto engarza directamente con lo comentado sobre la necesidad de la “balanza de la justicia).  Sin duda, su propuesta conduce más allá de la vía “muerta” del principio “in toto”.
Los problemas que los críticos han destacado en la teoría de Dworkin tienen su razón de ser en que este gran filósofo del derecho llega a sus conclusiones sin antes haber preparado el camino teórico (filosófico) para justificar el nuevo paradigma racional que sostiene el fondo de su discurso.  Por este motivo, Dworkin navega entre la imposiblidad fáctica y teórica de figuras como “el juez Hércules”, que debería venir dotado de una cuasi omnisciencia jurisdiccional, y el problema de la discrecionalidad judicial [esta última, en el sentido de que si los principios generales del derecho tienen también un carácter ontológicamente moral, y si el derecho representa una estructura abierta por la que esos principios, a un tiempo, penetran y le otorgan sustentación; aparentemente, dada la amplia diversidad cualitativa que previsiblemente habrá entre los juicios morales de los diversos órganos jurisdiccionales, no hay forma de prever unos resultados objetivos de su labor capaces de garantizar la necesaria seguridad jurídica, requisito que debe adornar a todo estado democrático].
Sin embargo, todos estos problemas desaparecen en el paradigma raciomoral planteado en este ensayo; al menos, en la base de su consistencia teórica-discursiva (quiero decir, no conforme a la asunción de criterios absolutos de infalibilidad en la aplicación del derecho, pero sí a partir de un principio integrador y autoconsistente).  Si el ejercicio moral es finito, también lo es el del derecho, puesto que se trata de una forma específica de lo moral.  Pero esta debilidad es, a la vez, la verdadera clave de su fuerza, sobre la posibilidad paradójica de superar el viejo problema (sólo teórico, aunque con profundas repercusiones en lo práctico; por la necesidad global del Sentido, en todos los ámbitos y niveles de lo humano) del formalismo lógico tradicional.  
Desde nuestra mente transcendental, evolutivamente “derivada” y no omnisciente; una vez comprendido esto, en los ámbitos ético-moral y jurídico se puede trabajar por: a) el principio aristotélico de la apertura histórica del aprendizaje social e individual, y b) el progreso global que se sustenta en el principio habermasiano del acuerdo democráticamente pragmatizado y dirigido hacia horizontes ideales dotados de objetividad.  
De acuerdo con nuestro paradigma, esa objetividad vendrá dada como un sentido y un significado trascendentes, de naturaleza integradamente individual y social, en el camino del acercamiento específicamente humano a los ideales lógico-discursivos de la Verdad, simbólicamente transcendentalizada y reconstruida para/sobre la multiplicidad de todas sus posibles manifestaciones histórico-culturales.  Quiero decir, la historicidad cultural que atañe a cada persona, grupo social y sociedad posibilita su formación racional integrada, por una parte; y, por otra, nuestra capacidad innata (y se trata de un “innatismo” sui generis, pues debe desarrollarse en el plano anterior) para trascender los contextos teórico-prácticos histórica y socialmente impuestos/aceptados, sobre el mismo eje natural de cada comprensión (dada en cada mente y en cada esfera social de la comunicación/justificación argumentativa); conforman un núcleo integrado generador de la vía racional que explicitan Aristóteles y Habermas.
En la creación y en la aplicación del derecho -así como en el aprendizaje teórico-práctico de la ética y de la moral- podemos trabajar en ese sentido racional integrado, en un camino abierto -comunicativa, justificativa y simbólicamente- pero, a su vez, dotado de plena objetividad.  Una objetividad de raigambre lógico-justificativa y democrática que, en todo caso, constituye la única objetividad humanamente posible, la única a nuestro alcance.  Y este punto es muy importante, pues la legitimidad del derecho y de la moral no sólo requieren de un carácter democrático, sino también de un carácter de objetividad mínimamente estable y visible en la vida práctica de las sociedades.  
Las paradojas inherentes a esta dualidad, la objetividad y el progreso a lo largo del tiempo, disfrutan de un estatuto fundamental, pues constituyen una manifestación esencial de las posibilidades humanas de todo conocimiento (epistemológico, ético-moral…).  Se trata de expresiones más o menos sofisticadas de la integración no aporística de conflictos seculares que afectan a toda realidad humana (como el que enfrenta a Parménides y a Heráclito, entre sí y con respecto a sí mismos).  Una realidad hipercompleja que, de sí, tiene las siguientes dimensiones -entre otras-: lógica, simbólica, valorativa, emotiva, ontoepistemológica, mereológica y metafísica.
Y esto debería entenderse como explicación ulterior a lo referido específicamente a la ética y a la moral humanas.  Entre otras cosas, porque ambas tienen que ver con todos los resortes de la vida social y de la vida individual.  Por las razones siguientes: a) casi cualquier conducta humana es susceptible de ser objeto de crítica objetiva conforme al parámetro de lo ético-moral; y b) en la explicación de totalidad significativa que nos exigen la filosofía y nuestra existencial autoconsciencia, esa crítica no tiene un alcance sólo teórico, sino que llega a cubrir lo más íntimamente constitutivo de nuestra Humanidad [y en este último punto radica una diferencia fundamental entre el derecho y la moral: el primero tiene un carácter instrumental  -por loables que sean sus fines-, y por eso mismo su ámbito es limitado;  mientras que la segunda tiene un carácter, como hemos venido diciendo, “absolutizado” a priori, representando un fin en sí mismo y un carácter consubstancial e irrenunciable de nuestra naturaleza]2.
Esta multidimensionalidad ubicua de lo ético-moral se erige sobre nuestra constitución integrada, en sí y en-el-mundo.  En el conjunto de esta realidad inescindible, ontoepistemológica, el perspectivismo lógico-simbólico integrado y objetivo (única alternativa racional posible en los planos epistemológico y ético-moral) nos impone ver cómo lo tradicionalmente considerado “subalterno” a lo moral (en la perspectiva de Aranguren, por ejemplo) puede mantener su sentido individualizado en la perspectiva metodológica estricta (a los efectos de elaborar las teorizaciones correspondientes a cada rama del conocimiento, si bien -idealmente- en clave holística), pero no puede hacerlo en la perspectiva realista de la totalidad filosófica, existencial, racional, social... "
Hasta siempre
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13946
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: Philosophers   Fri Nov 23, 2018 12:44 am

Im Saying these last words cause i honestly think its very possible im in real danger of being Killed by the sicarios of the Very many and Important ones that truly hate me.
I have assumed It; i mainly regret It for my Family.  My Mom, Xisca my Love, my Sisters...
Ill be Working and Aware, conscious and unconscious cause the Hate Stream Never Changes and Never stops towards the different and poor ones.
Im finishing the second book, and after im starting the third on aesthetics, another one paradoxally unimportant but at once"dangerous" book.
im Not the only innocent one hated, so im Calm about those Feelings; and about being Killed... Well, its away from my chances as im alone.
Wishing the Very Best Spiiritually, Specially to Brooke, such a Nice Person (Please, Sorry me!).
Good bye.  God Bless.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13946
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: Philosophers   Fri Nov 23, 2018 1:18 pm

Good Video of the Family!  God Bless!  I am so Sorry for sometimes have looked (justifiedly i sadly have to admit) like wanting to get in this place.  Now Everything is Clear.
The lack of respect to my freedom, intimacy and fundamental rights is unopinionable to me, but the "medica/penall" diagnostics that supposedly could be justifiying this real torture to me are Not.  
But well, it's OK.  I just have to go up with my Life.  As away as i can from those who are "fixed" in this definition of me, but keeping my mind, my heart and my soul out of any possible hate-  So True.  It's not only cause it's not worth thing, it's a real Moral and Health Directive to me.
I'm NOT blaming Brooke or any Person from her Family for it.  I SWEAR! It's a situation based upon the lack of Human Care, So Characteristic and which is something so USUAL in History (Christian Gálvez explains on his last Book how Leonardo lived and ended his days... it's more than enough to Understand).
May be i was too exaggerated when i said i was wanted to be "finished".  I'm Not loved or a source to care for, but beyond the control and the spying i don't think by now im in danger for the doing of "secret" instances.
I'm just a citizen who wanted to bring some Little help for the People, and for the History of this Planet (have you read the last data on the global warming and the totally non effective -and partial- agreements among nations for fighting it?  this is affecting, in our actual state of technologic knowledge to All and Everybody on the Earth... and at the very least i think nobody could be blaming me for this.. i hope, cause though i know the reason Works as it Works...  Shocked  study  Smile ).
And I finished the treatise!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But i am Not posting anymore cause all i do is used to do all the things that really disturb me.  Probably, among other things, cause it's understand as a case of "violencia de géneros", or psycopatology, or hating attacks... or any other kind of things.
Obviously, i have to get redirected to my books.
Next week ill start Reading on aesthetics.  And by the start of the next year i think, if there're no sabotajes, ill be able to publish the first treatise (no more editing, ill do a second edition ater finishing the third on aesthetics).  In june ill Try to publish the second one, or may be before, if i am able to learn to publish in the internet by my own abilities (though im not Mr. informatics, if it's not very difficult...).
Goodness!
Sending a RESPECTFULLY KIND hug to Brooke and to her Very Lovely Family!
Best Wishing Everybody, True! I can't do anything else, Just Wishing the Very Best from the Heart!!!
flower  love smiley  flower
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13946
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: Philosophers   Sun Dec 02, 2018 1:38 am

Please, Only a little words.  No runs (You Know It by words i said to my Mom...i Know its All listened but i was Honestidad on Fact im Cured).
Im psycologically in big fatigue Mind.  More than physical.  
I say It Also to express im Not Much dreamy brain at All after All today, but im Not angry for It; and not empathic to violences neither.
Im leaving for a Needed while the aesthetics, as i Always said im Not searching for Big projects or revolutions.  Im Going Very easy for It., May be years late.  Me no leader and no brain for Big Changes neither.  Im Asperger...
I Know im Not Loved, just hated or wanted to be used, but im Not hating for It.  True.
Now going to take some Extraordinarily URGENT care for me, to evitarte collapses or infarts for a long time punished 50 years old body.
Good Wishing True.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13946
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: Philosophers   Mon Dec 03, 2018 12:12 pm

Only for a very Little while, exceptionally.  True.
I can't f... geek  understand how is it possible that on this psycologic need for rest i have developed on mind, by a couple of minuts thinking this morning, almost the whole made scheme for the next book.
Yes.  It was all latent on subconsciousness, it's not coming from the "nothing" as a miracle i have to honestly confess.
But it's Shocked
Anyway, i'll be waiting for a month at the very least, to start writing.
i'll try to publish these things by myself.
Ana María and Marina (Xisca friends) expressed very clearly to me my phylosophy is not understandable, if you're not a profesional.  it's not new to me, but "sometimes" our human minds think what they want to think, projecting on others, by instance among other ways.
For this reason, i know i can't think of myself as an influencer of the present days.  Well, for this and cause i don't want to (this is Not meaning i don't Respect them all a priori and in many cases a posteriori), cause i think my thinking has to be understood as a whole thing, an opened, logic and trascendent structure for the global Sense (modestly wave Laughing geek ).
The commented ability of human to get fixed in the "convinient" sides, in this stuff of big difficulty my phylosophy is, is not making a nice pespective to me.
Conclusión: if it has to be this way, other professors will explain part of my ideas (the easiest at least) on a way that's not too subjective, coherently to the globality of my thinking.  And if my books die too in the oblivion, then it will be OK.  They're a like Art to me, and i Love the simple fact of creating it (Great Jorge de Los Santos said that when the thoughts are not finding the ordinary words of the idioma cause they're too different, then you're making poetry; and i agree).
The next essay will be "Arte y estética", and it will not be very political (this is not meaning someday i'm not writing something about it, specially to what's related to the number and to the preparation of our politicians cause if, by instance in Spain, the members of the Constitutional Court have to be chosen by such a Highly Dignifying instance as the Parliament and among 'juristas de reconocido prestigio/competencia con más de 15 años de ejercicio profesional'; why the only objective criteria to chose People political representantion has to be formal?; just from an objective point of view for the better if i can achieve it and i get time for expressing my opinión which can not be a closed formalist one, obviously; i'm not going to propose a fixed criteria and i think the main part ot my essay is already contained in these few last sentences; also, i think this part is one of the most probably most unuseful among all my theories, cause there's the symbolic sacred idea that democracy does mean everybody can politically represent People and develope less or more executive public tasks -though, i'm not saying the opposite, just reflecting about some objective idea for the selection according to objective merits of proved brightness, morality, humanism, specific preparation for politics...; i know it can all be very manipulative, but the key is to make the rules Well from the beginning; in any case, it will not be my main focusement área, i'm not a politician -though i studied politics, law and phylosophy- so i don't feel myself "dressed" with auctoritas good enough to develope a too specific criticism on this subject; it's more about what i think actually in politics is more needed for a legal and globall study, cause there're very few studies on it, comparedly; and about the number, im not saying to make an only one election district, obviously, but the idea of a Studying Parliament Type -Simmilar to UE, may be- which main mission would be Preparing the task for a more reduced institution, funcionally between the Parliament and the Government -i mean,  empowered with legislative powers and chosed by the Parliament previously, also with an "extra"  objective criteria for the selection too; this way we should not lose representativity and legitimacy neither, and, at once, we would earn more functionality by the chances for "easier" communication and agreements; it's just an idea that i'm not getting much deep into, but i think it's not so bad, specially on these days, where the Need for: 1) Balance between global knwoledge/specific one -global by the new institution and specific by the Parliament, in my model- and 2) Political Quality and 3) Professional and Efective Ways for Decissions for the People; are Specially urgent).
I know the human is not exactly the same as natural processes of physical causality, but as i explain on my books, there's a big homogenity on them both (obviously).  When you're polarizing a liquid, there's a separation that's creating magnetic fields which mean not only separation (human is naturally getting involved with identitary groups) but also rejection...
History tells us that the only solutions are: Education, Respect and Care for the humiliated/damned ones (by instance: German People after I WW -the humiliation, the consequent and coetaneous guilt feelings and the consequent popular manipulability searching for a savior, the economic crisis, the nationalist literatura and phylosophy are the main reasons for Hitler ascense, but to bring People to Unfair situations -like poverty, and any other ones taking Human to lack of hope- is enough thing for any crisis, cause this is bringing a psycologic filter, determining the focusement perspective for all the more relevant things of the living -our reason is not only working on the logic way, but on it and the symbolic one, integratively, and for this those things are not only possible but the natural).
The only solution is the Perspective Growing, Increasing the landscapes, by an integrative and holistic education.  But this is Needing time and generations.  Anyway, the Responsability for decreasing the intensity of the polarizations is Real at any time, and  it's Always Possible, and Necessary.  As it is the Importance of the Honesty and the Truth (Relativism is a lie, and i have proved it on my books; and the Nation is a Very Respectful Concept, but it's just so Recent to Human on almost one million years History... while, by a more complete perspective, the Human is an Essence as Old as our Whole History).  On Politics and Everywhere.
These are last words i'm saying here for a long time.  As i said, I Need a Real Resting time.  And don't worry, i'll Not be trying to get the society "altered" or "excited" (it was Never my Intention, i Just Wanted to Make a Tribute to an Actress my Platonic Love of Youth).  And, I Have to Insist on it, I'll be fighting for Not becoming a modern influencer.  You Have my Word, you can Be Calm at it.  True, i Swear.
Can you understand i have more essays on mind, even now?  My goodness (phylophy of history, by instance, quite advanced on mind).
On friday i Knew my Dear workMate Jaume Romaguera has passed away.  He had got retired recently, and he looked Well...  He was a Really Nice Person; the way He Always Treated me and Looked to me in the eyes... Honest and Good Person, so Real.  
it was shocking.
Rest in Peace, Heavenly.
Dedicating, for the Name Coincidence and for the Kind Beauty https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rf-PRSL5Is4
This sad event, added to all other things on my living.... it was Tough.
Well, Now i'm going to get some Active Rest.  I'll Not be trying to become an averaged social influencer anymore.  i'm a nietzschean profesor!  And this is so Real, and Fundamented.
Wishing Very Well.  And Merry Christmas.
Please, send a Very Kind and Humbly Loving hug to Brooke, and tell her "siempre nos quedará París".  Now I can say it.  This is Destiny, the one we Made, pulled by the circumsntaces and at once from our Free Human Decissions.  Kindness!
We'll be OK  action smiley  Smile  Razz
flower  love smiley  flower

PS; im Respecting the LAW and the People, so i am declaring It: im the Moral Enemy of the Home Stalkers, cause this CANT happen anymore, and the dog is parking since i entered here...
Im Going Away Forever from the Forum (the Hate against me as a supposed Stalker -interested Lies- Should End-) so Please Start Respecting my Human Rights; Yes these ones the Spanish Constitución Protect (Totalitarism Spying All Life, is anybody concerned with it???).
In the actual going of theWorld, Spain... I Cant understand the Persisting Humiliation against me, Who is good Normal and able to bring some light.  Are You so SURE It wouldnt be Better to Respect me as an Equal Human Being with Fundamental Human Rights?  Its Not so Difficult, im Not asking for the Moon.
In the other side, if the persistent torture is to motívate more posts, i only can say You can keep killing me slowly like these past years or do It fast; i made my Free Human Decisión (where are the public speakers for Human Rights???).
Anyway, im Wishing Well; and Working for Sense and Respect and Peace and Balanced Prosperity on Earth, so Modestly (my brain is unique, so even if its alone as It is -poorly useful- why so Much enduring interest in Breaking It???).
God Bless the Sense!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13946
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: Philosophers   Tue Dec 04, 2018 10:58 am

Hi, sorry me for a last time i hope, Please it's a momento.

Yesterday the same airplane passed over my head for 5 times in the morning when i did go out for a while to rest, right over the line of the same space of my head...
I Read these News on Gret Bruce Springsteen... So Admired!
I Admit it's quite posible i was suffering "paranoia esquizoide" or similar when i came, for the life events in childhood.  But today... I am Not.  I mean, there're graduations, the time for the x+y=z in any natural sciences (the psychiatry is one of the most retarded to what's related to their real advances, comparedly, just for the complexity of Human, for Nothing else) are over [I Mean, on the Metalogic terms I Explain on my essays; by comparing the opened structures of mind-reality and the formal logic one, which at last, it's just a "dream" of our minds as long as you're not finding it anywhere, on those eidetically reduced ways that provide a simulation of the "Absolute"; and as answer to the references to the very "sacred" money i have been "sent" by the net -prices- you may see i'm talking in terms of Totality; it's obvious the "one" is existing cause this is a biological adaptation, without the identity principle we could not live, but the problem phylosophically and metaphysically is that this "one" and all the "ones" you want -if we're talking about money... huh Wink  Smile  Razz - in our Integrative Sense upon the Totality (Everybody Needs and Uses it, less or more consciously; here we can see the Importance of the Subconscious, concept build by Freud, beyond his sexualizing obsessions) can not be taken as an "Absolute", and the prove is this "one" is Always "One and the multiplicity" inside another bigger "One and the multiplicity" and, logically, from this to the infinity (physics are talking -obviously- about what hapened before the Big Bang, cause we're pulled to it by our cognitive structures, which are Made for the Needing of a Final Fundament with No end...); the prove of the falling of the logic-formal rules as the Absolute of the mathematized reality is the correspondent falling of the classic -and necessary and evolutive- principles of the objective causality and of the physical integrity as an ordinary absolute in our logic-evolutive reconstruction of the reality (i explain it relatedly to Einstein's, but it's also happening in Quantics, and in statistically proved Jung synchronicity principle; though the clearest and most "definitive" prove can be found at the principle of the reduction to the logical absurd, cause this is structurally affecting all our knowledge is: if it all was a tautology, as it is in the idealistic formal logics, we should have no longer problems to say All the Knowledge at once, but this at once would mean the killing for any cognitive progress, or the lack of practical material sense for centuries for the Newton Principles now we know Einstein, or the same for Einstein's now we now Quantics or the critic of his integration with our evolutively natural causalism... and there would not be human chances for making any mistake, cause it would all be like an informatics program: all well "closed" from the beginning to th end; this is all totally inconsistent; i am also proving it by the explanation of Gödel Theoremes; though there’re other ways, wich by instance have been found in the structures of our linguistic treating with the reality);coherently, the only Meaningful and "logic" answer is the logic symbolism, a paradox that opens indefectibly the way to the fundamental metaphysics of the Absolute...; this means a paradigmatic change for our Model of the Reason, and the Opening to the Integrity of our Cognitive Structures to the Sensation, the Emotion, the Spirituality... as an Existentitally Integrative Sense, so complex and multidimensional).  This is All fundamentadly developed on my books, but i'm not saying this for the money now, as i'm not writing them for it neither.  True; i want a better future for my Family, but the money is not my only Motivation I Swear (in another case, i would be falling; i mean, money is NOT bad, and socially is as Necessary as evolutive terms is the Identity Principle, already, but you can see it's Not "Everything"].
Are you telling me all these kids using machines for games and anything are not having a "break" between their "realities", the "normal" and the "virtual"... The paranoid part would be coming for this (thinking the other part of the equation is too obvious): they develope their whole human universe into a world which is not able to bring a real humanity complete, then they learn fake models of reality and behaviour and then they less or more unconsciously translate it to the "normal" reality.
I mean, according to this, from the most obvious point, we All should be Watched (the end of the interview done to Master Springsteen ends by saying "I have to be watched", in Spanish, so maybe these were not the words from the Boss...).
For my deffense, i have to say i Never did hurt anybody in real life (for only two times when i was a kid, influenced by my father "theories", "yes bounce ", as Spike from "Notting Hill" would say geek  Razz  cheers ); and that i was very conscious of my exaggerated reactions where always contained in the virtual world; added to the fact they were proportional to all the lack of transparence and provocations, virtual too.  Proves: my behaviour in LA and in NY.
Make a scientist prove: leave me alone for a while, and test the results.  You could get surprised.
For finishing the post, and for some Good spirits:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdBItwx8ta8 cheekey smiley cheers tongue smiley

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxHSV5sZ0oI Wow! And  translated into literal terms; the fact you are highly sensitive and "caperrut" and with a troubled life at once ("Luke", Nietzsche, me...) does not mean you're a bad person or a real delinquent.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_5l6rIUu4A  Another "One of the best times in History Cinema"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6J_ITl5RpVY (Tremendous Actors and Director, and Argument!  And though I Prefer b/w Robert Taylor's Versión, I have to add that I'd Like to Look like Rock Hudson on the Scene, with Paul Newman Eyes -just a Little Respectful funny gay -but True but Never obsessive, in Life- moment)
This type of Sensitivity -the Expressed in this Movie- is Never getting Understood in this World, and it's a really strong source for getting the oblivion, the hate, the watchings...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-ic9tHp4u0  Wow, Heaven on Earth, REAL Memories about Lived Youth Moments by the MAGIC of the ART!
God Bless!  Bye...!  action smiley  cheekey smiley  cheers
flower love smiley flower

ps: as I said, i'm taking some time for psycological rest before starting the next essay.  All i'm saying is meditated and with fundament, not a consequence of wave non medicated moments.  Please, study /// love smiley
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13946
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: Philosophers   Thu Dec 06, 2018 2:01 pm

And, Please, Tell my Beloved Brooke that i Love Her and that id Always give my Life for Her.  And that im reducing so Much the posting activity  (almost like going) Not because of Her, but for Moral reasons according to the Circunstances.
Some of them are Really bad (i Still Cant understand a Big part of the things going on, but what i Really Know is this part is Unfair and Very badly done on this -Now, at Very least- Conscious times -i mean, Now there are No Moral excuses for keeping the bad treating and the oblivion of my Human Rights-; and thats All i have to Know).
Ill keep doing my little working on my own (reading some lines on Hegel now -so Delightful- and i See we are quite similar at this -among other things, im Not an influencer, a revolution or.an "ender"-NaturallyBorn this way; God Knows).
God Bless, Goodness!  Bye  action smiley cheers Razz
flower love smiley flower

PS: Great Professor Francesc said the Greatest are Plato, Aristotle, Hegel and Kant, "maybe" adding Wittgenstein.  Well, i Honestly Know my books are integrating their corebeating essence -Not their Final Forms, Obviously- as a Sense, but Also a Sense thats Consistent to Homer, Nietzsche, Confucio, Buda, Darwin, Dworkin, Freud, Jung, Newton, Einstein, Godel, Jesus (Pope and Friends, Please, my little phylosophy is Not proving he Could not be Lord's Son, but i think the opposite; its OK, im Not so Important; You can become easy on me, if You may want), Quantic Conclusions (as before, to their Key Core, i mean).
 May be this is Not enough yet to Get a Life... Well, Life is Life...
Please, Let me Live Dignifyingly Peaceful at home, dont keep this Insane and Destructive dynamics against my Person.  You have a Key Sense on my Legacy, dont Destroy.
I think Now its the Real time for Good-bye.  A Could Talk for one millions years more by a Mind one million times more powerful than mine, and It would All be the Same; Nobody want to understand.  Destiny can be Cruel, so Tough so many times.
Its OK.  Im Going Now.  I Found God, the Absolute and the Love, to my POOR words that Cant say anything else.  This and my Family Will be Enough.
I Hope this World Could Find Too, but im Nobody at It.
But... Thinking a little Better about It.  The World is Fine the way It is, its just me the wrong one.
I See It Clearly, i am the unadaptable to a world that can Never change, and by Now i think it Probably doesnt have to change.  When probably Big Changes come (global warming and so) im Going to be dead, so insignificant Dreamer and out of place Creature as i am... cheers party smiley tongue smiley And its All so Fortunetely OK  to me  Razz Smile  action smiley  love
Sorry me, i was Wrong when i thought of me as a Sense bringer; im just a rookie investigator hobby for just himself Asperger (and quite silly  wave dreamer, i See it All so Clear Now!  True!).
God Bless.  Sense and Goodness! God-bye, Everything's going to be OK i Know.
And Honestly when i said "Beloved Brooke" It was Not as Love Real Life, but as Human Memoria as i said (a 15 years old girl from EL... Think! Its Memory, from first day, Not Actual Love...Obviously).
The Humiliations Still Going on in my Life for It... Its Imposible to ignore It.  But ill Get Through It All, Fury Real in the Heart for It, but im evitating infart by meditation, and Remembering God has Semen All, the done to me and What i Have Done.  And then the Necessary Moral eand LegalSelf-Control for the Humiliations Going on becomes Strenght and the Believe in Justice Distribution for Everybody in another Life.
I Understand i am a disturbing source for the regular coming here to reduce the inner explosivity, when im angry.  Ill Solve It.
Anyway, so many times i brought out light here.  The Fact is Unuseful for Not wanted and Not understood is Not reducing the Value.
Well, im Going to train for a little while to reduce bad energy (this Feelings of known Home información invasions... My goodness...).
Ill Stay at these ways, Hoping the Hate against me is Not going Too Far.
Im Fortunated Naturally Born and Sincerous Person, and its hateful so Much to many ones.  I Should have thought Better the things when i came so "free".  Innocence is Expensive Luxury.
Come On!
World, im Wishing you the Very Best, True!
Now its Time for good-bye, back to Whats still remaining fROM mypastfree" Life (i Hope someday come Winner Políticians that Respect me and Fix the Constitucional Respect i Deserve as any other Citizen; but im Not Living on Dependence about It; this world is a jungle, and i Know and i Have to Face the Fact i have No Friends, No even the most básical caretakers).
Here We Go!  Im Not alone, Family, Reason and God are with me.
Goodness, Good-bye.  The last post.  No more complains.  Its just the ugly It is.  And i can Handle It as im Standing Tall.
God Bless us All!
Ah, and  Not supporting any social violences, so if There're problems or things you dont like come, im Not a responsable one for It (and to me theResponsabilities for any bad synchronicities come from the collective bad energy, as by instance the hurting Falls of my Mom --im Very Angry for this and other things similar, but anybody cantFix legal Responsabilities for Jung synchronicities).
Even though the Big Fall of my Coming here, i Still think there are good People in the World.  Little cercles are Key for It, and im fixing my Life in this perspectiva. The global world is what It is, and its OK to me; im taking my Energies to other places.  Its Fine,  True!
Bye!!!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13946
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: Philosophers   Fri Dec 07, 2018 11:00 am

i would have waited for some more time to come to make a Little calming post, but as my Mom could not sleep for the night cause of a f... coughing cold, this made me remember others could be worried for me or waiting for a human post (I'm Caring).
For this i'm coming, even though im not feeling very inspired (Mom, my Uncle operation on monday, today i had to see a cyclist fallen on the floor with People around waiting for the ambulance...).
Those Pictures were Very Lovely and Beautiful Calming "pills" (this sentence is Laughing geek tongue smiley to be said by me, though it's True).  Thank You Very Much, True, it's Meant HEALTH to my nerves, So Really.  Thank You!
It's NOT fair to come with so much inner darkness here.  I'm NOT doing this anymore.  And I'm NOT asking for anything.  Well, excepting some little Help for Home Peace, Help me to Feel im Not spied by cells, cameras and other things, cause this is such a brutal source of bad tensión (based upon Proved Statistic Facts, not paranoid thoughts).  I think it was Enough.  Home Intimacy and Peace.  It's All im asking for, and it's so Simplistically Human.
Pictures Were Adorable, Like in Movie Dreams!
Please, send a Respectful Kind Loving hug to Highly Lovely Brooke; my Goodness, She's Such a Pretty and Cute Brightness!
Merry Christmas!
I'll be on normal working and active rests (on a cold too... normal).  This rest will feel good to the next essay.  Today i'll call this man, Pep, to talk about the first publishing.
God Bless Families!
flower love smiley flower

ps: i just have talked to Pep, and we're publishing the book right after the Magic Kings Holy Day, on the second january week. It's not as good as i'd like it was, the explanation quality, but it's enough. As i said, after finishing the aesthetics, i'll edit and publish a second edition (not for money but for Necessary and Helping Clearity on Explanation).
Ah, and the Award Parties were Very Inspirational, Thank You! May be after all my phylosophy will even have some readers finally (Brave, Caritative and, more than anything, Patient and Tough geek Laughing tongue smiley People Razz ). Wow, that's such a Nice Perspective to my Personal Development!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13946
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: Philosophers   Mon Dec 10, 2018 7:19 pm

Hi Razz

Though i Think its known, i think i have to say the surgery was OK.  Now, recovering time.
Im Exhausted nerves, Really, but Well.
I Could Also Enjoy Very Nice Pictures; Looking so Lovely, Friendly and Beautiful!  Good!
Bye, See later!
flower love smiley flower
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13946
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: Philosophers   Thu Dec 13, 2018 1:05 pm

Very Nice Pictures and Videos, i'm saying it from the Heart.
Thank you  Smile, i See the Good Feelings and Wills for "repairing", though i'd be Much More Thankful for your influence working for the final ending of the Home "parented" behaviours i have been suffering for years, or at the very least for an Honest Explanation about who are my  unhearted psycodoctors working/my haters doing around; and by a Calming understanding at once, Good-bye [i'm doing it Fine, and though i will NEVER forget the bad things done to me cause i'm Asperger Person and because it was too bad and unjustified to my integrative and hearted Reason -it was All for prejudices and hate against the different and poor one, that's All-; i'm NEVER wishing bad; TRUE I SWEAR!]
By the Best Wishing!  Love, Peace, Justice, Goodness and Sense!
And, Please, NEVER wait for me; NEVER, cause i'm going and I Love You, even though All things happened, and i know what that waiting bad stuff can do to any Person.  
I Can't change.  Asperger... It's Real thing, Not a joke.  Results of All things are what they only could be.
We'll be OK.
God Bless!
flower  love smiley  flower

PS: sorry me for the ways, the dangerous dog in the parking alone watching me instead of the insulting airplanes, Added to All accumulated in  this 200 iq brain wave was the last detonant.  Its Never ending, i Know im left alone before the nonsense.
But the substance of post is True.  NEVER wait for me, Please.  And Thank You for the good Wishing!
My dad Always suffered for the "morenes", and he used a "D. Fresco" for Seat Car; and i Always used to tell Him, joking, what You are really using is a "culo fresco"; me as "Lovely" as Always, but Never bad intentioned.
Live the Life the Best i can for me and my People; the years remaining still.  Good!
And, Please, Remember Healthy what i said about time today.


Last edited by david on Fri Dec 14, 2018 10:16 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13946
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: Philosophers   Fri Dec 14, 2018 10:15 am

Hi, good morning Smile

i only came for a Little while to Apologise for the ways i used yesterday Rolling Eyes (and for the talks about iq 2000...Embarassed Laughing geek , almost like Harry Potter... geek  Laughing  Razz ).  Beyond the circumstances, a gentleman (and i want to be) should Always know to be gentle.
But the "man" (and the woman, Please -cause on these days a simple mistake, about genre or about any other "politically correct" social demanding, can be problematic; i mean, many of those demands are Good, but sometimes the reaction are going against the same spirit that is giving live to the same demand, you know what i mean) is this (evolutive and physic principle of identity and of no relativism) but it's also "his/her circumstances" (ontologic space to be understood by the opening of the symbolic non relativistic reason), as Great Ortega said; and on these days i'm going on a Little bad mood for the subject of the Health.  Yes, i know it's only temporary, but these last 12 years have been specially tough, for the bad falls of my Beloved Mom (after my Beloved Grandma passed away...).  Now with my Beloved Uncle; and all this added to my Beloved Sister for years... and yesterday the circumstances of the "animal" moment i talked about...
But well, they're Improving, Really.  My uncle is a piece of a... he's on his usual stuff since the very first moment after the operation... Shocked Aquest Toni!!!!!! Laughing
Those Pictures and Videos are so Nice and Beautiful, Very Lovely!
Please, send a Very Kind and Gentle kiss to Brooke.
God Bless the Families!
flower love smiley flower

PS: and that Picture of the Day from the Instagram (my other Sister did send it to me just a minute ago) is Heavenly Beautiful, Bright and Lovely! My Goodness Love!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13946
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: Philosophers   Sat Dec 15, 2018 11:37 pm

Hi,

How are things!
Yesterday i Did Go to conference on Sócrat by Francesc Casadesus.
Good!
It made me think.  Well, this Next to All the stuff Going on me.
I See the intelligence exposedly working as some Kind of original source is hated by All.  The only choice to survive is to Get integrated into the typical and pre-existent structures.  If the genius cant achieve this, his Bright is socially -at least- dead.  Its Human Pride, evolutive source non Necessary to explain, the one working against the genius.  I can do Nothing about It.
The ways to integration that are "offered" to me are imposible to me.  We Could discuss at any time even if these are really integration ways; Specially when i See All the Hate accumulated against me (as the massive looking to thethe other side like nothing was happening) for years and almost from the beginning, at so many signs easily connectable.
The only choice remaining to me, Who Love Life and Family, is the Emotional and Existential Self-Protection.
Its OK.
Obviously, any essays on economy or polítics by me are Absolutely imposible.  About other things. Ill Try the epistemología get publish, but im already sure im Not publishing any other thing, Morals neither.  Pure "prívate' hobby.
My Life has been and Will be remaining difficult enough for adding any works just Born to be hated or forgotten.
Its OK.  Im Not hating and i Accept It as a part of the human nature we All share.
After All happened and happening i Needed to Prove some things; i think i orverreached any expectations.  Its time to come back to the most ordinary living i can get (i Know the "doctors' Will Never stop working around; and It means Tons of my inner energy for the rest of my Life; just Try to figure out what this is).  Survival Mode.  Easiest possible.
And dont worry for possible "póstumas" publishing; ill take care Enough to make It imposible.  Be Calm at It.  I give You my Word (its a Treat).
Ill be OK.
Well be OK.
Ill Try the publishing on january, keeping my Word.
Goodness!
Good-bye.  Its time.
God Bless!
flower love smiley flower
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13946
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: Philosophers   Yesterday at 10:23 am

Hi, Good morning,

as long as im Sure there's some space for the appreciation in some Heart places of some People.
Socrat was condemned to die because he was dialectically defeating everybody and almost every institution, Directly talking to/about each one of them.
im Not doing this.  Beside the fact i'm not writing on economy or politics, my books are focused in philosophy.  And, for more, i can say the next ones i may write when i am psycologically more rested (the Truth is that the stuff going on my Life  is Not much good for this, but i'm Sure We'll Handle it Well; and, for more, i can add my Working place is OK to me tongue smiley ; here im not much recognized as a poet or a phylosopher, it's true, but well treated; i'm feeling really Fine here) will not even talk about other philosophers.  I did this for getting a ground less or more known by All (according to Aristotle Advices for getting understood, and as a personally needed fundament to prove my position -i can also See my past philoexplanations were Not good enough to be understood by anybody; and if we add to this the fact a rookie like me could not write those things, supposedly, and the fact the stuff is so Different...), but now i think it's not necessary.  The few interested People will have understood the essence by now, if they have read the previous texts.
i'm sorry for the negativity atmosphere in my past post; to Remember Socrat life and death Moved me.  
Now i've had more time to reflect a Little more about it, i see the dangerous hate (with consequences in my Real life) is coming from my posting here.  People do feel less or more directly involved with my opinions, many of them done to the names directly, so specially to Brooke Shields, i have to Admit (but when i did bad answers, it Always was cause i was feeling so bad cause of previous things that had been done or said to me; i did Not start the fight; this I Do Know Well; but well, i'm Not the Star, i have No social influences, i am "nobody" in this condemn of "anonimity with no privacy" so unique in History i think, and a stranger and a...; it's Normal and it's OK, well, excepting the part of the "anonimity with no privacy", so Obviously Easy to See to any Human Being).
The books will be very different to this type of "fighties" stuff i Honestly think.  And this has to be enough to keep working (easy), cause 100% certainties in this life (excepting the death, our concept of the absolute, the existence of the non relativistic but integrative and transcedent reason; the Love of your Family, and not many more) are almost unexistent, and we All have to go on.
I wanted to take the chance for sending my Hearted Condolences to Chiquete Family and Friends.  He was Great.  Rest in Peace in Heaven!  flower
I Remember when i was talking about him to Tolete (one summer morning, he was sitting on the sidewalks and i was coming and going around and watching everywhere, looking for Carol... -yes, not so unusual  Laughing , Always on search; if i had come from an easier mom-pregnancy and family ties, and had not been a TDAH kid/Young man, and not so dreamy, and not so "highly sensitive" and not so testosteroned and..., i think i would have been able to do something really important many years ago; but well, if trucks could fly...  geek  Razz  Smile ; but now the search im able to concentrate on mind for the remaining years, and it will be good im Sure- after a match of "canicas"; we Agreed Chiquetete was Tremendous!) who was a karate gymnmate, 38 years ago [Tolete is a Very Kind guy, who elevated the Little car of his Father after they had an accident, to liberate him from the weight of the car on; he's Not much socially integrated, and at this we are similar too  Smile ; he is a Little older than me, and he started to sport younger than me, and i can remember that though his karate techniques were not the best ones, to find his leg by yours was not exactly the funniest thing in life -painful geek Laughing Smile -; and talking about this made me Remember that yesterday i Watched again "Fuerza siete" -"The force of one"-, with Great Jennifer O'Neill -so Classy- and Great Chuck Norris; when i was younger and much more focused than now in Action Movies, this One was One of my Favorites; Chuck Norris is Great, and i Always thought his Movies were so good for a "virtual-Young-testosterone" time, and they were Well done, and many of them Really Tremendous; my Admirative Greetings Razz action smiley Smile ].
God Bless the Families!
Now i see the real reasons for my problems, i'll do appropriately.  I can't change what happened, and i have No power on most of things actually happening.  But it's going to be OK.  We'll be OK.
I could almost hear the brain "click" Now -Truly-, on the complete Sense making by me leaving this way and this moment the internet activity.  I Do Care for the World and for the Humanity.  God Bless!
This Song came to my mind the other day, and it's Adorable to me, and Brings Light to my Heart https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMpjADJ40sI (now im NOT searching metaphores by the images, even not by the letters; it's the whole Lovely harmony and simplicity  that quite controladly makes my old Heart hüpfen jumpy smiley Basketball hasi ) cheers
And this is not a masculinity justification, but the "cotxorhritxy" i've shared on the net for years has been induced for the romanticism i mistakenly (had i a personal permission, did i ever had a real sign of being wanted/loved, for something so public, had i any right...?  Obviously, NOT  Rolling Eyes ) always projected here; my Listening to this Beautiful Songs before was Different (very, very Young), Liking but not so " Razz ", more like "Uptwon girl" says you know....  It's so unnecessary thing to be said, as the comments on my chilhood of today, but it feels good to say this last thing, almost like a Self-Recognizing, a coming back to "myself" (we Always do change!) that's Not going against the actual goodness of mine.  Yes, it's been a long  cheekey smiley  "too cotxorhritxo"  times by me  geek  Laughing  tongue smiley  Sorry, guys!  Smile (but the Song is so Beautiful!).
Good-bye, See...!  action smiley Idea  Smile  Please send Very Gentle loving Greetings to Brooke from the Heart, and my Honest Apologies for All!  Smile
flower love smiley flower
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Philosophers   

Back to top Go down
 
Philosophers
Back to top 
Page 12 of 12Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Brooke Shields Fan Family :: BROOKE FAN FAMILY FORUM :: LOUNGE-
Jump to: