A little step for a man, but a big one for the Human: the Coming of the Conceptualized Idea

http://salvadorrodriguezz.blogspot.com.es/

Hi!!!!!!!!
I've got it (it's quite candid, the difficulties expressed, quite actoral terms, when it's something easy; but I wanted it to be done by the normal inertial helping of my Family). Today in the evening Activating it.
Now that I'm having a public identity, I'll have to be much more serious and responsible (how! ; no Really).
My Sister's boyfriend will read, I'm as a favorite among those of him, and I told my Sister the first post of all will be, just some surprise: "Cuñaooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!".
I don't know if I said this, but thesis director told me I could prolongue a little the ending of the doctorate, Justifying it. It's Calming, to my Actual Developing.
He Congratulated me, for the reducing and fixing of the subject of the text. It's just for making the Book More Explanatory, Clear and a More Homogeneous Treatment of the Subject (this means Clearity, not bombing readers with too many different concepts).
All concepts are related one each other, but the understanding of each one, into the wide complexity I'm trying to get and fix, does need different pathes.
God Bless. Loving.

Hi, transcendent terms!!


Conceptualized idea, or, better said, the symbolic-conceptual thinking in the transcendent opening, or the metaphysical bases of our functional reason("pensamiento simbólico-conceptual en apertura transcendente, o las bases metafísicas de nuestra razón funcional").
Here we're going.
Good hug, Loving, I'm not angry with You. But I have to do what I MORALLY have to do.
Have Peace and Love.
I know you all adore, many of you at the very least, and among other things, to see me this fixism on moral loving whatever the bad treatment may achieve; but I'm not doing it as a show for you.
Very Focused and Determined about what I Think it's the Right thing to do.

Hi!


Too much success among the masculine population, lately I guess
Not only the Videos, but just a little while ago a workmate has told me "guapo". True! Coincidences.
Believe me, the main problem about this is the fact he was driving
Good Guy.


For some more :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OAkIfsuZtQ
Tremendous!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZDqwX39wbg
Genius on spanish tradition, Berlanga and the Cast.
The coming was very low, but it did finally happen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7HahVwYpwo
How Nice Song!
Halfway, there's the Ocean, so, from my Beloved land:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtvlK-i8oWU
Tremendous Champions! Come On Faster.




ps: And Happy Birthday to All Ladies on their Birthday too!

Hi!


How are things!!
Listening to this now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwuxrWM-KuQ
My Mom did see last Pictures, for me asking her about dress. She Liked, but there's some criticism. Yes. She said it would fit even more a little longer or shorter, but not that middle on leg, dress. She said she Knows. And as long as She said You Very Beautiful, I did not say anything else. She Liked.
(critic eye I think it's a family gens of us! )


On Derrida have to say that I Love the way he's using his Critics on "logocentrism" (there's not a previous sense to the writing, represented by the logos, classic understanding of it; idea which is connected to his criticism on the "phonocentrism" -he also critizises, inspired by Freud and Lacan, the "falocentrism" me, remembering your last words in "The Hot Flashes"; the little pennis was about me, I think it was about Maturing metaphore - - ).
his critic of logocentrism is based on metaphysic understanding of the self-reference, the old problem: where is the original voice to whom you're talking for fixing each reflection conclusion?; as long as it's justified by the phonocentrism (some almost metaphysics supposedly fixed as concept of reference for sense and truth), as much as this is not qualitatively different, metaphysic terms, from the written idiome.
From the intuition on it, and taking the "difference" as linguistic concept from Saussaure (role of "morfemas", spanish word, for making the linguistic sense, from unities that do not have and bring by itself, and which main characteristic value is to be what they are as long as they're representing an identity inside of the system of different letters: importance of the difference, structural one); he builds up the concept of deconstruction, by bulding up the concept of "différance" -not difference, unfortunately he's not using the "vive la difference" -how bad joke -.
The concept of deconstrucion is related to an opened perspective, never fixed (he does not want), analitic and critic but something more he never defines, as long as he explains it can never be defined (his metaphysics), which is able to put up and down the traditional antagonism between meanings on any texts or narratives, by the using of multiperspective on the using of differences inside of the text (lexical or any other possible kind of grammar type). An example: the feminist concept of Nietzsche, an obvious "unconfident" about the role and character of women, put upside down by explaining his own way of making philosophy, typically feminine...
Well, it's the specific possibility I've read. I'm making sense by projecting the whole coherent body of his ideas, have to add. but I think I'm all right on it. my opinion, of course.
As long as the idiome is not able to get reduced to the logic-formalism from traditional vision (based on the outside reference, as something fixed, for the sense and the concept of truth, from the outside of the text), he explains the opened and unfixable spaces of all texts.
This can see in translation, he says (sometime he defines deconstruction as the union of different idiomes, for the impossible to erase problems in any translation: showing up clear the problems of the non fixable limits of meaning).
One time I less or more have fixed the fundamental principles of his general philosophy, I can pass to say the text is opened on time (now going directly to only the text), for the different understandings of it on time, as meaning. And that time is the space and the space is the time on the process of understanding (more than about cultural subject, I think he talks about the "space" of the metaphysics in texts, as opened unlimited phenomena to be developed by the "alteridad" of each reader).
It's a Perspective he's using, focusing totally in texts, by previous justifying of the uncertainty for sense and truth coming from the classic logos, and of the "phonocentrism" too (problem of falocentrism is a more derived question I think, though important to him, very, and related to unconsciousness).
To me, he's very Bright and Fine on this understanding. But it's like taking three dimensions for making a projection in two dimenions on the paper. No matter how many projections you're making, for and by the "différance", this can never be able to capture the whole meaning of existential metaphysics, from which the one in texts gets its fundament, on the mentioned "projection" of a face of two dimensions from a figure of three ones.
Anyway, to me there's a concept very good. Well, beside the metaphysics he's Explaining so Greatly, even though only about texts, derived from the problem of selfreference for fixing Truth and meaning and sense.
The concept of "alteridad", as the bases of ethics. As long as he can explain the problem for the oneself (this is my personal projection on his thesis, not read on Book), he understands he can make this General to All "readers".
He claims, in fact, he's not fixing reality only in texts, but also in politic-institutional system. For this his interest on Ethics and the problem of the "Other". Though, there's no possible coherence between one thing, the unique perspective on texts, and the other one, the thing out of the text (culture and institutions and politics), even though you're fixing quite well the opened space in all texts. He's reflecting in a Very Coherent System, justifying all for all I've explained, it can be seen; but there's reductionistic problem in the only focusing in texts.
Uff, he's very Original!

Hi!
I said the day it is, but i am not very nationalist, and more citizen of the world.
Not much impressed neithet for genealogy. You deserve for what you do, not for what your ancestorsdid. Guess forum dont like this i say because not let me separate words.
If kids and family canot be punished for crimes of a member, somehow its recognizing responsable is individual. Prizes logically, semantic and ethic are the same.
I still dont understand intromission in my private life. You rich, famous and noble roots, and me nothing of it. But i thought equality and freedom was something real on these days. Was so bad what i did, when lack of kind was always only an answer?
Me deceived about public system of justice. Not antisystem. Just poor and deceived.
Just truth.
God Bless.
Love hug for Good!
I know i am actually more valuable, for my brain. Its normal.
I still, whatever, want to help the world.
Love and Peace.

Hi!
This titled subject is related to the last one i did right before entering the bed.
Felt so good lol
Well now you seeing even geniuses ("jo no ho se"; sorry lol but it
sounds like) go to sleep.
Well now real: good night on a heaven's hug!!

Objective terms its how i see my task.
But a step waiting for many more coming after, the same way or
better.
My goal i think will just be to have
redirected the philosophic
discussion to its Necessary first
plane in world of ideas and in
practic world of life, and also have
brought it to a true point of global
coherence with itself and the rest of the word. Also, maybe, to have
shared too some new and more
complete ways and routes for the
thinking and the living, or at the
very least, to have actualized and
legitimated to these days those
integral and natural and complete
(by erasing too partialist
perspectives that have to be taken
to its Good context, the applying of
cientist methode, but not the whole
existence) appropiated and Normal ways of and fot the Reason.
Now that i think about it all, i think this is almost too good for me, a solitary and averaged guy from a little island. But well, for this im Working so Hard everyday, and about This, añso, ive Dreamt since so long time ago, when only a kid.
Now true Good night rest.

Hi!
On very defined need for balancing efforts and rests. For this not able ro come so much and talk so much, and not follow so much. Though keep visiting, on lower frequency.
Great news: fixed thesis subject with key goals to me: original, not latin, related to epistemology and inside of clear and easy to catch context of bibliography. Tremendous Help to me!
And saying im finishing on may 2016, or even a little later in case of finding good combining between final reflections and first touch withthesis.
God Bless, Good night.
Tomorrow coming, but not sure when. And easy.
Good Loving Hugs!!

I want to insist in Painful coincidences because grammar mistakes in last post.
- meeting in the street, and me
talking to a Honest normal
neighbour when the evil passed by
next to us, related to my
conversation but said for the
pervert trafficant: "im exploding...".
This said on Tragic friday before
knowing anything. Evil him can tell
you
- day before last terrorist Tragedy
in Africa i started using for first time after years a ballpen from Radisson
Hotel NY.
Please. If you dont care about me
care about this. Retire these
satanic ones sent to me.
Its just a suspicious matter but its
worth doing something, for just in case, because it takes so little
effort; just in case my lack of calm and justified anger could do something related to bad things. I Swear my Hugest and atrue Reason for Urgent Answer for Law Respect are these disturbing people, so unfair. I Swear im with Human
Destiny, Peace, Democracy and
Life. I Swear.
Prove: my Never saying anything pedophile. And my Total Inner Calm about my Moral Doing.
Second Prove: cant you see im trying by philosophy sense bring help for real, as also trying to erase all my campaigns from the past for the existential need for fight? Responsibly, explaining and sharing where is not the solution (inner violence never more) and where and how we can give a chance to this world and also achieve the moral salvation, which not depend on existing or not another life after dying, thogh i do!
God Bless, im just Human, Not a bad person.
Good night, Love!

where the hell is human going, in fact, as the real hidden truth?!