Brooke Shields Fan Family

Forum for Brooke Shields Fans
 
HomeHome  PortalPortal  CalendarCalendar  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  

Share | 
 

 my Good Friend:

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13606
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: my Good Friend:   Tue Jun 25, 2013 5:59 pm

only one more time.  LOL
In the "hermeneutical" LOL mode of interpreting things.
I'm quite Well and Good about Everybody.  Not angry or disturbed.
I mean, if Looking Directly it's OK, I am not more anything than anybody else, ABSOLUTE and that does not admit a simple little discussion.
And Believe me, that's How I Think and Feel!
Peace and Love!
flowerlove smileyflower
 
ps: maybe brain works well, but how much I wish to go to the beach (finally some rhyme, fun!) and take a bath at the sea (bikinis will not be a problem, hahaha, sorry, I had to laugh for what I said SmileSmileSmile) and Watch something on TV and Rest.
But there's Work to be Done (and please, don't tell anybody I am using this for convincing myself WinkSmile).
flower I Love You so, Brooke!! flower
flowerlove smileycheekey smileylove smileyflower
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13606
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: my Good Friend:   Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:19 pm

Hi,
 
sorry, I promise it's the last "tostonius" (from "tostón" in spanish) I'm posting today.  I had to.  Came like Pulsion to mind.
Had to use second idiome, because it was impossible differently.
Sharing, Hope it can be Understood, specially when using translator from the Internet, and that it can Help! It's my MOTIVATION! Smile action smiley 
 
"La razón teleológica -del giro pragmático-psicológico del  “common sense” humano (= única forma de descubrir su naturaleza)-, o la búsqueda bioevolutivamente condicionada del “SENTIDO” como fundamento vital-emotivo-racional de nuestro mapa conceptual de la realidad psíquica multidimensional (sin entrar ahora en valoraciones o razonamientos sobre la mayor o menor certeza posible sobre la equivalencia entre la realidad psíquica y la realidad, digamos, ontológica).
La pulsión ontocrática se manifiesta en el simbolismo que describe el giro narrativo rortiano, como forma concreta y naturalmente autoinducida de vida mental plena; pero la explicación de su fundamento se halla en el pragmatismo psicológico-conceptual del sentido común, o “common sense”, que desde siempre (el método científico es una idealización y una sistematización metodológicas cuasiperfectas de procesos mentales ancestrales) guía el pensar y el quehacer humanos (acción) en cuestiones de supervivencia y de mejora de las condiciones psíquicas y materiales de vida.
Ambas naturalezas (pulsión ontocrática y “common sense lógico-natural”) coacontecen históricamente con el pensar abstracto, y se hallan entretejidas con él de un modo inescindible en nuestra mente.  La primera, como impulso significativo-emotivo-racional primigenio; la segunda,  como procedimiento lógico de respuesta evolutiva-ancestral a la realidad física, y social (esto más recientemente y menos determinantemente en cuanto a la estructura de ese “sentido humano Común” -aunque es imposible olvidar la trascendencia fundamental de los mecanismos humanos de la empatía, éstos, creo, operan mayormente en la primera),  del contexto de génesis natural del hombre.
Ambos, junto a las querencias y emociones, forman un cuerpo abstracto único, no obstante,  para cada individuo; el cual, a nuestros ojos,  adquiere presencia física (cuando menos, parcial: queda todavía por demostrar el hecho de que todos los procesos de pensamiento/emoción se hallen TOTALMENTE en la fisiología del cerebro) en las conexiones cuasiinfinitas de las redes neuronales de nuestro cerebro."
flower love smiley love smiley love smiley flower 
 
flower And You're my INSPIRATION, Brooke! flower 
flower love smiley flower
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13606
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: my Good Friend:   Tue Jul 16, 2013 3:04 pm

Smile Hi for a while, never wild Smile 
party smiley tongue smiley party smiley 


Came for Two and also for some more unmodest, I admit, Sincerity.
Sharing.
Before, when out of Thinking, focused in ordinary living too much and too negative terms, mainly upon the bad to see and find and not that much upon the good, was feeling like prisoner of life. True!
Now I've found Freedom in my mind and my heart.
Anyway, I know well, and not only from the reason but also from how I'm feeling if too selfpressuring my Thinking as disconnected from daily living, I've got to balance two sides of Life.
Coming Here, that Became like Friendly Lovely Daily Living, is something that keeps my connection to "earthy" days much better, though what I'd may seem (or, quite probably, what it was in the beginning when I came).
So, Easy to see the Evolution Here.
We came from The "selfishest" cloud of mine, poetic and all but not realistic (Fantasy is a NECESSARY UTHOPICAL FINISH LINE TO GUIDE US, and it's a Place for Shelter too, but it can never erase the Real Living), to the "Coming back to Reality".
Honestly, think it could not be better.
And I Love You!
I Love You, Brooke Shields, beyond the Screen!!
flower love smiley flower 

ps. see later for big Friendly Touch!!
cheekey smiley hasi cheekey smiley 
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13606
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: my Good Friend:   Mon Jul 22, 2013 1:14 pm

Hi,
 
came for a while for some more One Smile cheers 
Today at night will Watch All I can from Video from "Inside the Actor's Studio", containing Interviews to Michelle Pfeiffer, Brad Pitt, Natalie Portman and some others whose name I'll See when Watch Video.
Smile Smile Smile  love smiley action smiley 
 
Expressing Love.
Oh my, it's too much to me.  I Have to Say these things.  Pushed, Very Much, from Heart.
God Bless!
About Actors, now from my personal "scientist" view (more upon methodologies of mine to Explain).
The ability for Acting, Fixing and Objectivating Emotions for Other People by a Psycological Intentioned Mental Process, Means Intelligence.
The better done, the more Intelligence.
From evolutive perspective, that ability means being Good for Strategic Behaviour, after Analysis of Logic of Situations; and, also, Analysis of Inner Processes and of Empathical Ones.
Actor, to be a Good Actor, from my modest point of view, Means to be Intelligent, Smart as You Prefer to say!
Well, Shared opinion.
love smiley love smiley love smiley   
 
Brooke, also, is Real Good!
Tom Green Knows, I Do Know, even Craig Fergusson Does Know.  This last was for bringing some geek to other things.
More Serious:
I don't believe in the only one dimension, talking about talent.  From most recent works about subject, plasticity of mind is Real.
I mean, not possible to be Good in Everything, but if You're Good at something, You can Be Sure You're Good at More than only that.
Well, more sharing, Trying quite Nice!
Love You, Brooke!!  Sharing for Everybody.
flower party smiley cheekey smiley love smiley cheekey smiley party smiley flower
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13606
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: my Good Friend:   Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:09 am

Hi,

some Mad for last days You see I've been.
Yes, I truly became.
This selective memory of mine, deep and quite "copying" but too "selective".
Focusing in the Good as Principle for All, Now.
Here and Around and Everywhere.
Only Way for Going UP.
Fortunetely, specially for my ego, I did not say anything I am not doing, these last days.
Not posting formalistic works because is, in my point of view, a selflatering nonsense. But this does not mean at all I am not posting All results I am finding out, in my searching for Life.
But, honestly, if I've said an opinion on something, do not think it's very meaningful to explain critics to other I may do in formal task, for rules of academic working.
It's Place for Constructing and Building UP Here, not for any deconstruction.
I know it's not coherent itself what I said, because confrontation of principles is always implicit there, but what I mean is the Spirit I Want to Bring Here, as Main Principle of All.
As Material/Formal Perspective for Intelectual and as Heartfelt One for Spiritual.
It's True I do not have any new conclusions. When got some new, I'll Share, as I've Always been Doing.
flower God Bless, Love You! flower 
love smiley flower love smiley 
action smiley Smile 
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13606
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: my Good Friend:   Tue Sep 03, 2013 1:08 pm

Hi,
Smile action smiley 

Good Morning How are things!
I came quiet relaxed, thinking was not going to speak that much, but well... You know me...wave party smiley 
First, have to say that, as I have supposed, today here there aren't ladies inviting me, so, for prevention, I came with some meal. Needs Satisfied.
Some fun.
I had not gone to the beach on last days because there were good ones with tough weather, raining hard and cold.
Yesterday went to a dinner, sharing time with People from here and from Sweden.
From the Baby (now she only wants mom and dad, but well, it's normal), I've learnt words for going to sleep, in this Beautiful Idiome. She says "nati, nati". Sounds really sweet!
Ah, and my new name is "abaddor". Well, this is how she calls me.
Had very good time, with Kids. And some Familiar Time, Very Blessing!
Smile Smile Smile 

What I shared about Dream was True. Today I dreamt of some other more, but don't remember argument. Feeling Good.
Task is going Well. Not easy at all, but going on Well.
When I've Reached, supposedly, the Conceptual Level on Philosophical Conclusions I Want to Achieve, though it's neverending process, I Truly Want to Explain those ones for People who has never studied Philosophy.
From my experience, modestly, think the Key for that deep conceptuality, to be understood, is the use of Metaphore. Have no proves, because metaphores I used when wrote poems where about some kind of Love, but the Expressivity I could Feel from them makes me think, as simple intuitive reason, it can be Useful for that.
Also, Idea comes from my theories about structure of human thoughts.
We'll see, we'll see. To reach the Wanted Level is still far, but each day I find it a little closer, as Living Achievement.
Going for it quite Calm, in Progress!
cheers Smile 

Thank You for All Pictures, Beautiful Videos, Messages and All, God Bless!
Love You Very Much, Brooke Shields!! You'll Always Live in my Heart! See later!
flower love smiley flower 

ps: For People who may have followed this story of Mine Posting Here, Truly Would Like this story, as Evolutioned Something, be Useful for Demonstrating How Important and Key is the Power of Improving our Selfconscience, such a complex concept (related to ourselves and to all other things involved from around), and How Important is to Think and to Dedicate Time to Cultivate and to Understand Culture and the Critic Thinking.
Good Education=TREMENDOUS SOURCE!
party smiley party smiley party smiley 
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13606
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: my Good Friend:   Thu Aug 27, 2015 2:58 pm

Hi,

is it possible I was wanting to talk about education and my brain somehow could remember the latest post in this subject? Shocked affraid I don't think so.
No, it's just that I'm Trying to "teach" my Mom how to be less emotional, specially when it's related to familiar problems. And, at once, I am teaching myself.
In this kind of stuff, we all know it's much easier to talk than to "properly" do, but I think it's possible to improve this side too, and health will always thank it.
Controlling the task, OK Mckey.
I am not sure if I said yesterday that the intuitive thinking is used in the creation of new brain circuits, its neurones: this is the creativity! And it's, as I said, related to all points between both extremes I talked about yesterday: "deepest conceptuality" and "asymbolic' doing of mind". When it's about following past ways, our brain is the Master. And it's only intuitive the recognizing of the identitity among/between situations, the rest is almost neuronal "mechanics". And for this all problems for changing our habits, not only because of hormonal rewards working as drugs in brain. Here we've got playing the very useful biologic entropy.
And this is all for today.
Now some more Focused tasking for a while.
Good Hug, on the Loving Fine!!
flower cheers hasi love smiley hasi cheers flower
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13606
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: my Good Friend:   Fri Aug 28, 2015 9:23 am

Hi!
Razz cheers flower cheers Razz

How Good Pictures, and Videos too!
Last night Looking Very Beautiful, Very Much action smiley bounce
Quite good amount of movements of Energy, it wakes up.
Very Good and Inspirational, God Bless Razz
Good job! And Good Hugs!! cheekey smiley
flower cheers love smiley cheers flower

ps: now, the Tasking, leaving all ready.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13606
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: my Good Friend:   Mon Sep 07, 2015 2:38 pm

Hi!
Razz flower Razz

Better weather!
People healing at home and so on.  Inspirational for the Calmy going.
Babies so Good.  A "new" one, one year but so good walking, Ona (="ola"="wave"), which Mom is named Genma was so special, another one.  By the "hand-from-lips" she sent me an "explossive" kiss when I was telling her good-bye.  It was quite intense, because even her grandmother was telling it to the people as something really cute.
Connecting,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNhq3RQHSmU
flower cheekey smiley love smiley cheekey smiley flower

It's true that connection of everything is a key.  I commented it for many times, even  till the point of thinking it's impossible to get the first "arché" for all of existence to us.  Nietzsche thought the same.  He, withouth knowing, was the first mother of hermeneutics, and Heidegger the second one.
The hermeneutic cercle, its essence, does mean that all is connected, and that the singular depends on the plural and the opposite thing, as a corresponding dialogy that we have to fix: about texts, but not only about this, because this is the essence of the same existence as we know it.
We're always inside of this cercle, and we can not get out of it.
This way, the second and general meaning I just said, related to existence, tradition-history and inidividual are also inside of this cercle, for any kind of understanding or explaining.
This is erasing the sense of freedom of the thinking, as long as it's all, somehow, predetermined by historic and cultural traditions.  We just have to make the right "deconstructive" interpretation for seeing it in every author.
This is TREMENDOUSLY KEY point, because, by a long terms developed argumentation on time, it's fundamenting the erasing of Key Values.  Without Freedom, values like Goodness, Empathy, Solidarity, Love... They Do Lose All of their meaning.
The very summaried structure of the evolutionary hermenutic thinking in history did start by those authors (having very big pulling by my Very Admired Dilthey), and the truly departuring point did start in the field not of ethics or existentialist ontology, but in the field of the epistemology.
Nietzsche "discovered" that, in terms of the most fundamental argumentations, it's impossible to know anything new without, somehow, knowing it before.  This mean that for each time you think you've found some new idea or thought, you're, in fact, making explicit something that was genetically put before in you by your contexts.
From this, Nietzsche is against the fixing of any concepts, and talks about the "eterno retorno" of the selfmaking, where the only value, as non ethic one but as the fundament of his thinking, is the "self-creation" of the "superhombre", free from this "prison".
But he was in a contradiction, and Gadamer does explain it at  the most radical level of consequences from his theories, started by Heidegger.  This last one said that Nietzsche did not made a general critic of metaphysics, but the killing of it.
And Gadamer, conherently understanding that the Nietzsche principles do mean the hermenutic cercle as a prison not as the departuring for the Nietsche superhombre, talks very explicit terms about the ending of the philosophy as we have been understanding it.  The new one is the deconstructivistic one, only one possible.
But here's a very reductionist point, in Heidegger and Gadamer, that it's only been understood, and Admited very clearly, by Derrida.  This point is the closing of reality in the structures of our thinking.
If this is not a renowed version of the purest Spinoza, come the author and correct me right now please.
Seconly, but not less important at all, it's the fact this reductionism is making the limits of our thinking the same existence.
But the problem of the cercle is not metaphysical in the way these authors say, and it's not capturing the basic ontology of existence, making it a finite and closed space totally away from any kind of transcending (=way to metaphysics, always).
The problem of the cercle is in the most intimistic and natural structure of our reason.
1) remember what I said about the connectivity of the brain and the building up of the Sense
2) remember what I said about the metaphysics of the change (coming from paradoxes from Parmenid times), as key point connected to the limits of our reason: we think by concepts, and concepts are always a unity.  The going from one to another one our brain can not capture, it's a metaphysic point.  For this, the statements of the hermeneutic cercle.
It's not we're prisoners of the context.  Well, I mean, we depend on it, but we're not totally slave of it.
The problems Nietzsche, Heidegger and Gadamer do see in our thinking is not fixing the existence, but only the way our brain does process the conceptual thinking.  They're confusing it with the force, important but not till the point of their statements, of history, tradition and culture.
The metaphysics of conceptuality does bring legitimacy, just by itself, for coming back to the transcendent perspective on existence.
It's the deepest argument I've seen (Emmanuel Lebinas Worked very well for it too, in different and Good reasons) for the fixing of the concept against too much radical consequences of hermeneutics.
Metaphysics do keep Freedom Alive (we'll never be able to fix if we're free or not, and not only as influenced by tradition cultural, but also -adding some other point to hermeneutics, brought by scientistic positivism now- influenced by the genetics; and we'll not be able to say if we're free or not because the knowing of the first fundament of our nature is not possible to us, the self.reference, proved even in the field of Logic, can never be totally fixed by the Intellectual reason, this presiding the thoughts of hermeneutics from Gadamer, even though he was against the positivism).
And if there's Freedom, or at the very least if we have to admit we have to do the things in the living, with ourselves and others, in existence, as we were Free Ones; the Morals and the Sense of Love and Empathy are Alive, as they Have Always Been.
There're other ways for proving the transcendent nature of values (Lebinas Did Great), but this one, very summaried here, it's the most fundamental I think, because captures the deepest arguments possible, using the Dicotomy I've talked about for many times which is made of the relationship of Logic-non Logic fields.  
I mean, if we're using the classic reason for making arguments against hermeneutics, there's no better argument than the one related to the same structure and limits of this Reason.
Only a last thing.
It's true that logic/mathematic expression of nature (Newton F=mg=m x m'/r x r, Einstein, Galileo...) is Tremendous, but only as the quantitative (and always partial, for the limits of our reason; reflected on Godel theoreme) understanding of the reality, not as the qualitative one of it.  This last one we can only build up by the conceptuality, which, at once, it is more than just logic, functional and biologic terms, as DAmasio explains (this is totally connected to the limit of intellectual classic reason, as the prove of there's something more than just logic working for our brain).
The difference quantitative/qualitative, and the unavoidable role of it to our thinking, it is just another fundamental point to the net of Sense I'm trying to explain.
I'll go deeper into this last point qualitative/quantitative in the chaper of my essay dedicated to science.
For finishing, coming back to hermeneutics.  Freedom is possible because we can not say the opposite.  And, also, it is possible because it's printed in our biologic reason, made of and born as conceptual jumps.   A reality, the conceptual jump,that is coherent and connected to the explanation of the problem of the conceptual continuity.
The artistyic/logic-conceptual creativity is Key to our thinking, and it let us going further than our historic and traditional contexts.  And this can also be seen by taking a look to the key authors like Galileo or any other ones who brought out a jump to our knowledge as rational species searching for Sense and, also, controlling the context of our existence.
Though, the answer to any possible "contra-argumentation" from Gadamer can only be made of my first argument about the structure of our reason.  I'll be presenting it better on my essay.
For truly finishing now: how could Gadamer and Heidegger argument the non existence of freedom as some kind of qualitative jump of the understanding reason, if they did take a look to human evolution? Was all of first "homo" printed previously in brains of monkeys?!!!
The last thing: the "naturalization" of reason has to be changed as a philosophic concept. This is understood, specially by the continental tradition of phenomenology and hermenutics, as considering the integrated human reason (integrated but non metaphysical!!! how is it possible!, it's just a very evident and elemmental mistake from the Philosophy of the XX century) as just the galilean and positivistic.
But in fact, it has to be understood, the Natural of the Reason, as a larger vision and much more huger perspective for the understanding of who we truly are, where we are going and coming from, and where we can actually and/or should go for the better of all.
The Natural does mean integrating our reason and the Nature, the Reality (much more than the objectivated result of our reason -so poor compared to only it, figure out how poor compared to the whole reality, from the moment we know how limited, compared to it, our reason is). That's the right and fine perspective for the progress of the same reason, as integrated circumstance, pure transcendent quality in (and before too, I have to admit: this obvious contradiction of "being in" and "being before" is laying in the same bottom of our transcendent nature; and now we understand the tremendous importance of this quality, we should be more conscient of this dicotomy, as much as we should keep going further into it, assuming and embracing it) the universe.
flower  love smiley  flower

For this, as long as all it's connected in our brains, I do have to feel well and OK for letting my brain work at its good working level.  If I feel too much sad, worried, hopeless, disturbed or angry, I can not process concepts the same, and the quality of my job can never be the same.
I'll be having some good time and rest, and working, for the next weeks.  Blessing!
God Bless!
Good Hugs, me Getting Adapted to the Situation, Brooke Beautiful.
Loving Good and True!
I Only Want the Very Good for the Human, and Bring some Help for the uncertain future coming.  That's all.  It's Much more about Getting Adapted and Morally Saved -Living not only Surviving- than about revolutions or glory for me.
I am not thinking any more if I'm achieving my goals or not, and about opinions or doing of others to me neither.
Working on my own Well.  Doing the best possible, and I'll be OK with myself.  Anyway, the more collaboration, the better results I'll be able to share.
flower cheers love smiley cheers flower

ps:  In some Transcendent Place, so Much Connected!! Seeing later Well action smiley cheekey smiley party smiley
party smiley hasi party smiley
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13606
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: my Good Friend:   Mon Sep 14, 2015 2:35 am

A new message. Here is quite like crazy working at this hour at night (and still waiting for me a chapterr on Freud now - Wow! Lol).
Its just that i did such a loaf -lol- of a jump. True. Rudimentary and incipient fixing of it is done. Qualitatively high on my thinking evolution.
Good Love; fine hugs!
Its going to be such a complete thing on human the esssy. Happy very much. Sharing.
Loving.
When said stupid was not talking about virtual posts indirevtly but friendly related to me; but about thingd done in real life.
God bless. Good night. Im going to be in bed with Freud for a while. Lol
Always Love!!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13606
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: my Good Friend:   Mon Sep 14, 2015 2:35 am

A new message. Here is quite like crazy working at this hour at night (and still waiting for me a chapterr on Freud now - Wow! Lol).
Its just that i did such a loaf -lol- of a jump. True. Rudimentary and incipient fixing of it is done. Qualitatively high on my thinking evolution.
Good Love; fine hugs!
Its going to be such a complete thing on human the esssy. Happy very much. Sharing.
Loving.
When said stupid was not talking about virtual posts indirevtly but friendly related to me; but about thingd done in real life.
God bless. Good night. Im going to be in bed with Freud for a while. Lol
Always Love!!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
david

avatar

Anzahl der Beiträge : 13606
Anmeldedatum : 2009-06-01

PostSubject: Re: my Good Friend:   Mon Sep 14, 2015 10:02 pm

Big hug True for Life; it is Forever!!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: my Good Friend:   

Back to top Go down
 
my Good Friend:
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Good Morning, Happiness!
» Confusion is good? Gerryspeak..
» Gary Glitter - it's good to be back?
» Celebrity Good Quotes
» Keith Mitnik of Morgan & Morgan - One of the Good Guys (Civil Case)

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Brooke Shields Fan Family :: BROOKE FAN FAMILY FORUM :: LOUNGE-
Jump to: